Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Yupster

(14,308 posts)

7. On the other hand

Reply to kennetha (Original post)

Sun Dec 3, 2017, 02:15 AM

Dec 2017

the powers of the presidency was very limited in those days. Whatever the president did or didn't do in 1830 didn't effect the average person's life who was living in a small town running a family farm. No income tax, no social security, medicare, food stamps, department of education, food inspectors. In short, it just wasn't considered that important who the president was, and the electors would never elect a crazy person anyway since the electors were chosen by the state legislatures.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump is demonstrating one of the Glaring Weaknesses in our Constitution [View all] kennetha Dec 2017 OP

They should have thought of 2 senators for every shit state and gerrymandering too. dem4decades Dec 2017 #1

+1 uponit7771 Dec 2017 #6

+1 Maven Dec 2017 #11

They didn't want to give too much power to the people. shanny Dec 2017 #2

couldn't agree more. the constitution is in need of a major overhaul. Takket Dec 2017 #3

I just read today that section 5 of the 25th amend was just BigmanPigman Dec 2017 #4

Kudos for broaching this topic. The three fifths compromise and it's sway on the electoral college.. brush Dec 2017 #5

On the other hand Yupster Dec 2017 #7

Not True kennetha Dec 2017 #9

Alexander Hamilton wasn't just an average guy in a small town Kentonio Dec 2017 #12

If you think about all the ways you interact with the federal government today Yupster Dec 2017 #13

For 1787, the Constitution was a masterpiece of legal engineering DFW Dec 2017 #8

The EC was a SOP to the slave holding states kennetha Dec 2017 #10

I bet they never envisioned someone like Trump. LisaL Dec 2017 #14

The No Confidence vote in Parliamentary Systems can be just as problematic malaise Dec 2017 #15