Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tom Tomorrow reposted this today - in response to the gun-worshippers who are howling today [View all]caseymoz
(5,763 posts)135. You can cite statistics to back it up, right?
That lawn furniture kills thousands.
The main difference is, when casualties of cars and swimming pools are mentioned, you never hear fans of them argue "Guns kill a lot of people, too." or "People don't drown in pools, they drown in people." Somehow, I don't think the first would help the defenders cause much. Whereas the second would immediately be laughed off. Why?
At least the benefit traded-off for deaths of cars and pools is fairly well known, and not very controversial. A car will get you to work, and only occasionally kill. Nobody protests putting safety devices on either. They can conceivably be made safer and less deadly because neither one are designed to kill people in the most convenient and effective way possible. If you're in a pitched battle, would you want an M16, or a swimming pool?
And, let's face it, both a car and a pool aren't the right tools. Killing with either one is like driving a nail with a vise grip.
Due to goals regardless of facts, debates about guns never go anywhere. I support the Second Amendment, but at least gun fans should admit that if you want gun rights interpreted to be an individual one, and applicable to so much, you are going to have consequences. Aurora was another consequence.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Tom Tomorrow reposted this today - in response to the gun-worshippers who are howling today [View all]
kpete
Jul 2012
OP
Hey, if everyone just carried their own lawn furniture the world would be a
smirkymonkey
Jul 2012
#119
I'll give you my chaise lounge when you pry it from my cold dead hands, you commie!
nilram
Jul 2012
#123
It extends to other countries too now. We must be sure that they have any and all of the guns
patrice
Jul 2012
#3
If you think those stats are directly related to the number of guns in this country
Zoeisright
Jul 2012
#66
Take out muggings from overall gun violence and the numbers should be MUCH lower
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2012
#103
BTW: I didn't imply the opposite AT ALL. In fact, I'm saying shootings are for worse reasons.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2012
#101
I feel like this comment has been cut and pasted all day yesterday. So I will too.
Pholus
Jul 2012
#128
I recommend a comedy movie called "Gunless." An American gunslinger finds himself in Canada,
tclambert
Jul 2012
#74
Not one. A massive study was done that showed that handgun owners, besides being more
apocalypsehow
Jul 2012
#38
How does one determine someone has prevented a mass shooting before it happened?
hughee99
Jul 2012
#46
Right, because institutional authority behind Tuskegee and Japanese internment
closeupready
Jul 2012
#20
The gun lobby is well rehearsed in its rhetoric which to me is used to bully everyone who disagrees
upaloopa
Jul 2012
#23
Yep - this cartoon nails it, right down to how cry-babyish our very own "pro-gun progressives"
apocalypsehow
Jul 2012
#32
Case in point right here. Peddle your complaints to someone who gives a fig; I don't. Thanks. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Jul 2012
#63
Yep: they get all a'flutter with outrage when someone calls them on their BS,
apocalypsehow
Jul 2012
#106