Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
6. Exactly.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 03:29 PM
Jul 2012

Them, or the chain stores which sold him the guns, donating to the victims families would at least have a direct connection to the tragedy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why? Bluenorthwest Jul 2012 #1
Why? permatex Jul 2012 #2
No. nt Kahuna Jul 2012 #3
No OhioChick Jul 2012 #4
If we're going to go that route, it would make more sense for the gun makers to donate n/t arcane1 Jul 2012 #5
Exactly. Lone_Star_Dem Jul 2012 #6
No. They are not to blame. Booster Jul 2012 #7
Throwing money at victims of a tragedy doesn't fix it lunatica Jul 2012 #8
No the NRA should. Warren Stupidity Jul 2012 #9
The movie had nothing to do with the attack TrogL Jul 2012 #10
Not really. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2012 #11
And why would that be? liberalhistorian Jul 2012 #12
Why? GarroHorus Jul 2012 #13
Do I think they should? No johnnie Jul 2012 #14
Thank you johnnie thelordofhell Jul 2012 #15
Absolutely, along with all the donations to the NRA. ananda Jul 2012 #16
It "would be a grand gesture by" those who oppose gun ownership to do so. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #17
They and their movie had nothing to do with it Marrah_G Jul 2012 #18
(sigh) DainBramaged Jul 2012 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do you think that Warner ...»Reply #6