Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: As long as the 800lb gorilla [View all]I would still hope the root cause could be worked on.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When was the last time someone killed 12 and injured 58 in 2 minutes with a knife?
Motown_Johnny
Jul 2012
#1
There is no perfect solution. Limiting the casualties is the best we can hope for.
Motown_Johnny
Jul 2012
#13
I am interested in saving lives. You seem to think you can change all of society
Motown_Johnny
Jul 2012
#72
Yeah, gun owners use facts and don't respond to histrionics. Arguing with them must be hell for you.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#26
Yep. Facts. Real facty type facts,even. Not the fake Brady or VPC 'facts' that aren't true.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#75
What kind of gun did Timothy McVeigh use? He killed 168 and injured over 800 in seconds.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#23
Exactly. But expect nothing but misdirection and straw men in response to the salient question.
villager
Jul 2012
#80
when somebody can walk into a movie theater and cause 71 casualties in minutes with a baseball
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2012
#2
Of course. If you kill 2 people with a knife but could have killed 12 people with a gun
treestar
Jul 2012
#16
The USA has a rate of gun-related deaths 8x higher than other developed democracies.
Spider Jerusalem
Jul 2012
#19
Quoting numbers concerning the tool over and over is not facing the root problem.
Tejas
Jul 2012
#30
He could damn sure kill as many (more actually) with just some gas alone or easy to make explosives.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#37
No, it's not. A bomb is. Using a gun on a lot of people is actually labor intensive.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#43
Sure, you have to pull the trigger, that's a tremendous amount of work.
Spider Jerusalem
Jul 2012
#44
That's like saying "all you have to do to use a jackhammer is pull the trigger".
Edweird
Jul 2012
#47
So are you denying the simple facts of the number of mass shooting incidents?
Spider Jerusalem
Jul 2012
#49
Substantiate the '20 mass shootings a year'. I saw 6 for this year. Where are the rest?
Edweird
Jul 2012
#55
So... substantiate. You've shown 6. Ok, so show the OTHER years with the more than 20
Edweird
Jul 2012
#60
Except we're talking about shootings including wounding, not just murder.
Spider Jerusalem
Jul 2012
#68
That move of the goal post didn't change anything. My previous post still applies. 'Mass' = >4
Edweird
Jul 2012
#70
Like your '20 mass shootings a year'. The source is relevant if it is lie. Gun grabbers lie.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#48
There are more things that we can do than your one dimensional solution to these problems.
upaloopa
Jul 2012
#27
As soon as they invent a 100 round baseball bat or knife that can kill scores within a few moments
hlthe2b
Jul 2012
#31
A 5 gallon jug of gasoline at each exit and the death toll would have been much higher.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#42
As it stands now, we can’t force people into treatment until it is proven that they are a threat to
left is right
Jul 2012
#65