Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Mueller's investigation is pardon proof -Federal local and state [View all]getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)43. there are only 5 people on earth who's opinion matter....
And 4 of those are certain. So in practice, only john roberts opinion matters.
If any of the 4 dems creats an opening, it's over.
Look at it this way. If a case involving clarence thomas came before the court, clarence thomas would be the one to decide if he had a conflict of interest in hearing the case. He, and he alone, determines it. He could cast a vote just by declaring he can put aside his own interests and make his decision on the merits of the case.
If they rule the pres has limits, they are saying they do, and they aren't likely to do that. It isn't in the constitution, so it will be an interpretation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What does a state AG have to do with making federal offenses pardon proof?
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2017
#22
Schneiderman nails them on NY state charges of money laundering, and state charges
tblue37
Dec 2017
#29
They could bring the state charges first if they are able to bring state charges.
Sophia4
Dec 2017
#28
But the state case could be for a violation of a state law that has not parallel
Sophia4
Dec 2017
#48
Also, Laurence Tribe's statement yesterday about the Presidential immunity myth.
byronius
Dec 2017
#10
That doesn't explain the OP's BIZARRE theory about being pardon-proof FEDERALLY. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2017
#24
Oh, now, over an hour later, you confess that you made a click bait title and HAVEN'T EDITED IT.
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2017
#25
I don't see any state finding a jury that will convict these criminals. They'll be at least
Hoyt
Dec 2017
#37
This is what I have always said... it's the money laundering that will get him and his family.
secondwind
Dec 2017
#39