Dear Democrats (and everyone else) calling on Sen. Franken to resign:

[Jarqui]

38. I did not say "near zero" you're making that up

But ask your math professor if zero or "near zero" are the same thing. I think he'll agree with me that they are not.

I am casting doubt on Franken's accusers because they may be behaving the way someone in the GOP wants them to behave.

As for this:

As to your first point - the primary dynamic, even (or perhaps especially) when the victim is male is that the victim is being treated as a woman - being put in '"her" place (even when she is a he). The vast majority of male rape survivors at some point express concern that they were targeted because they were gay/effeminate/not enough of a man. All of that has roots in misogyny, regardless of the gender of either victim or abuser.

In the article I linked above:
"For example, of juveniles reporting staff sexual misconduct, 89 percent were boys reporting abuse by a female staff member."
So are all of those cases of females with penis envy? I sincerely doubt it. And these are just boys as victims - they have not fully identified with being men yet.

or google images for "female teachers sexual assault"
https://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1094&bih=478&ei=16woWu31LI_mjwT0kLCACg&q=female+teachers+sexual+assault&oq=female+teachers+sexual+assault&gs_l=img.3...3916.14808.0.15097.32.17.1.14.14.0.181.1962.4j12.16.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..1.22.1847...0j0i30k1j0i5i30k1j0i8i30k1.0.H-mgR-T7CmM

How does your theory on misogyny ("when the victim is male is that the victim is being treated as a woman - being put in '"her" place (even when she is a he)&quot hold up in those cases above? Your theory doesn't hold water in those cases but those males are victims just the same.