Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ruby the Liberal

(26,664 posts)
24. So if I am not in favor of unlimited and unrestricted gun (and accessories) rights,
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 06:58 PM
Jul 2012

I am "no different than a post 911 RWinger"?

Does this mean that in order to qualify as a liberal, I need to start petitioning for grenade launchers and anti-aircraft weaponry to legally be installed on my roof - because the government has no right to set limits, and only good "liberals" will fight that fight?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Given how subjective that is, I feel free to tell you that you are sadly mistaken. Edweird Jul 2012 #1
+1,000,000,000,000 n/t GarroHorus Jul 2012 #15
So if I am not in favor of unlimited and unrestricted gun (and accessories) rights, Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #24
I believe that is what is called a 'strawman'. Edweird Jul 2012 #29
Actually no. It is a question. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #30
OK Edweird Jul 2012 #34
I'm more interested in your purity test Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #36
There already are limits. Edweird Jul 2012 #37
You confuse me with a gun grab proponent. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #38
Here are Federal Limits Edweird Jul 2012 #39
Oddly, I posted just that below in this very thread in response to someone arguing Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #42
Hey, we don't want to end abortion, we just want some limits. Edweird Jul 2012 #45
I just realized you aren't the OP. Edweird Jul 2012 #46
Would you prefer if she asked the question? Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #48
No, nothing like that. Edweird Jul 2012 #52
What I'd like to see: REP Jul 2012 #49
You mean like something similar to being licensed to drive a car? Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #53
Well, not like CA's DL program where you can fail the road test and drive on a learner's permit REP Jul 2012 #68
I don't see a problem with that. Edweird Jul 2012 #54
I think it's reasonable REP Jul 2012 #66
It's the proliferationists who truly live in fear... villager Jul 2012 #33
That's pretty disconnected from reality. Edweird Jul 2012 #35
so's your reply villager Jul 2012 #63
What 'mad scramble'? You're the minority on DU. Even more IRL. Edweird Jul 2012 #65
Yes, Edweird. Keep imagining this is an NRA discussion board villager Jul 2012 #67
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #69
Wow -- Stephen Baldwin can see this issue more clearly you than can!? villager Jul 2012 #70
Actually, I've always felt that gun OWNERS live in fear frazzled Jul 2012 #43
Nope. Not afraid. Edweird Jul 2012 #50
I always felt this way Texasgal Jul 2012 #57
What good will a gun do if you are asleep? blueamy66 Jul 2012 #83
LOL bongbong Jul 2012 #60
Yep. Gun Grabbers live in fear. They lie to try and spread their fear. Edweird Jul 2012 #64
Yep bongbong Jul 2012 #73
Unlike gun nuts who live in perpetual fear of weekly home invasions Scootaloo Jul 2012 #76
Gun religionists fear posts like yours bongbong Jul 2012 #87
Wow. Speaking of a sad world. Brickbat Jul 2012 #2
What about police and armed guards? bluerum Jul 2012 #3
I agree. JeepJK556 Jul 2012 #4
Yep, next step, NO PROTESTS WITHIN CITY LIMITS GarroHorus Jul 2012 #14
What part of the Constitution still applies? RC Jul 2012 #32
So you want the urban people disarmed Shankapotomus Jul 2012 #5
Urban usually vote anti-gun mayors=blue safeinOhio Jul 2012 #6
Gun control has racist and classist roots, especially in places like NYC ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #7
At one time it might have. safeinOhio Jul 2012 #8
It has similar impacts, even today ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #9
Being urban poor minority means a greater risk of safeinOhio Jul 2012 #11
Some do ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #17
Most urban folk michreject Jul 2012 #44
What about people who live in cities who hunt Blue_In_AK Jul 2012 #10
I don't think a city dweller cares about safeinOhio Jul 2012 #12
You are in the wrong here. Everybody has a guaranteed right to own a gun. nt GarroHorus Jul 2012 #13
Felons too? What about Children? Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #19
Here's a clue, the right to vote is guaranteed , but children do not have that right and felons can GarroHorus Jul 2012 #20
No, you said, "Everybody has a guaranteed right to own a gun" so lets explore that. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #21
YEs, they do. James Holmes had a guaranteed right to own firearms GarroHorus Jul 2012 #23
Okay - so let me get this straight. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #25
Legally, they are not mentally ill until a court declares them incompetent. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #26
That isn't what you said though. You said "Everybody has a guaranteed right to own a gun" Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #27
You're going around in circles for no logical reason. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #28
I don't blame you. Lets look at the Gun Control Act of 1968. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #31
Funny reply! bongbong Jul 2012 #61
I've started putting them all on ignore. If I wanted to read RW swill, I'd morningfog Jul 2012 #82
Just realized - since you brought it up, Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #71
Holmes bongbong Jul 2012 #88
Yes, non-violent felons. Their right to vote should be restored also. Tejas Jul 2012 #77
What a load of crap. zappaman Jul 2012 #16
Prohibitionists: guns for me but not thee. Tejas Jul 2012 #78
I don't love guns, nor do I hate them. I live in a small city. Marrah_G Jul 2012 #18
I'm keeping my gun for protection in my home, thank you. Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #22
All these armed trained secret servicemen couldn't prevent a bullet from hitting Reagan lindysalsagal Jul 2012 #80
Yes, it's not the guns involved that were the cause or the cure. It's something else. Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #86
That ain't gonna happen michreject Jul 2012 #40
I don't think you realize just how insignificant this issue is, but here's a tidbit to keep you Egalitarian Thug Jul 2012 #41
I'm not a gun nut Texasgal Jul 2012 #47
for these situations you are better off with a 12 gauge pump action loli phabay Jul 2012 #51
The pistol was cheaper Texasgal Jul 2012 #55
yup my wife was the same, but she now likes the security of the 12 gauge loli phabay Jul 2012 #56
I came from a family of hunters. Texasgal Jul 2012 #59
You can get a basic .20 at Dick's for less than $100 obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #62
People who bring guns into cities out of fear create the very environment that makes them fearful. baldguy Jul 2012 #58
So killing OTHER animals is okay. flvegan Jul 2012 #72
I know a good reason to bring them in cities. Zax2me Jul 2012 #74
Thanks for the condescension. cliffordu Jul 2012 #75
The bodyguards for Mayor Bloomberg pack machineguns, they don't look very sad. Tejas Jul 2012 #79
At times the world I live in is pretty pitiful, but that has nothing to do with guns. hobbit709 Jul 2012 #81
Yeah...that has worked sooooo well in Chicago. guardian Jul 2012 #84
I live in the city but have country property... what do you propose belcffub Jul 2012 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A message to those in cit...»Reply #24