Dylan Farrow: Why has the #MeToo revolution spared Woody Allen?

[pnwmom]

3. Not true. The prosecutor said he had probable cause and the only reason he didn't prosecute

was because of the victim's "fragility."

I don't think that Valentine, after her long time partner seduced her teenage daughter, the sister of Woody's children, and ran off with her, is a sign of Mia's being crazy.


https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2014/02/woody-allen-sex-abuse-10-facts

4. Allen subsequently lost four exhaustive court battles—a lawsuit, a disciplinary charge against the prosecutor, and two appeals—and was made to pay more than $1 million in Mia’s legal fees. Judge Elliott Wilk, the presiding judge in Allen’s custody suit against Farrow, concluded that there is “no credible evidence to support Mr. Allen’s contention that Ms. Farrow coached Dylan or that Ms. Farrow acted upon a desire for revenge against him for seducing Soon-Yi.”

SNIP

9. The state attorney, Maco, said publicly he did have probable cause to press charges against Allen but declined, due to the fragility of the “child victim.” Maco told me that he refused to put Dylan through an exhausting trial, and without her on the stand, he could not prosecute Allen.