Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kskiska

(27,165 posts)
34. Dylan Farrow's Brother Moses Says Mia Farrow, Not Woody Allen Was Abusive
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:46 PM
Dec 2017

Excerpt:
"Of course Woody did not molest my sister," Moses, 36, told People magazine.

He continued, "My mother drummed it into me to hate my father for tearing apart the family and sexually molesting my sister. And I hated him for her for years. I see now that this was a vengeful way to pay him back for falling in love with Soon-Yi."

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/dylan-farrows-brother-moses-mia-farrow-woody-allen/story?id=22377303

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

B/c the police investigated and didn't find any wrongdoing? bathroommonkey76 Dec 2017 #1
Not true. The prosecutor said he had probable cause and the only reason he didn't prosecute pnwmom Dec 2017 #3
Um, no. The dr who interviewed her 9 times for the CT state police didn't find her credible: VermontKevin Dec 2017 #7
That doesn't change the fact that the PROSECUTOR said he had probable cause. pnwmom Dec 2017 #8
That's why judges determine probable cause, not prosecutors. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #9
No, it isn't. The prosecutor didn't bring an argument for probable cause to the judge pnwmom Dec 2017 #10
I think the point went over your head. A prosecutor can say they have "probable cause" VermontKevin Dec 2017 #20
He didn't arrest Allen because there was no point once he decided pnwmom Dec 2017 #25
This nt Laffy Kat Dec 2017 #28
The prosecutor she keeps citing was disciplined for his statements. He was wrong. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #37
Actually, the information we have now is that Farrow defended Polanski, and was an abuser herself. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #35
According to subsequent articles, Dr. Leventhal did not personally interview Dylan Tanuki Dec 2017 #13
Thanks for the link. I hadn't see that one before. n/t pnwmom Dec 2017 #18
What's Mia Farrow got to do with it? The DA found probable cause and declined to prosecute MaryMagdaline Dec 2017 #2
The Dr. for the State of CT interviewed her 9 times and did not find her credible because of Mia: VermontKevin Dec 2017 #5
That 1993 article is wrong. Numerous articles since then have correctly reported that Leventhal pnwmom Dec 2017 #11
Thank you MaryMagdaline Dec 2017 #14
And Ronan Farrow witnessed and has always confirmed his father's inappropriate behavior pnwmom Dec 2017 #15
Yes MaryMagdaline Dec 2017 #16
And Moses Allen, older, and now a therapist himself completely disputes the version his VermontKevin Dec 2017 #21
Ronan and Dylan say that Moses wasn't in the house when the worst event occurred. pnwmom Dec 2017 #23
Moses was in the house. Mia was not. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #36
Babysitters were there, Moses wasn't. pnwmom Dec 2017 #42
Neither article supports your claim that Moses wasn't there. I notice you don't discuss nannies who VermontKevin Dec 2017 #43
You must have missed the paragraph where the Court lists who was in the home. pnwmom Dec 2017 #44
As to the nanny you mentioned, who was paid $40K a year by Allen, (a lot in 1993), pnwmom Dec 2017 #45
Dylan Farrow's Brother Moses Says Mia Farrow, Not Woody Allen Was Abusive kskiska Dec 2017 #34
And Woody has probably been very generous financially with him over the years. pnwmom Dec 2017 #41
Good question Gothmog Dec 2017 #4
Ny times link that explains why CT police concluded Farrow was not molested: VermontKevin Dec 2017 #6
That 1993 article has been discredited since then by more thorough reporting. n/t pnwmom Dec 2017 #12
You keep using the prosecutor who was disciplined for his actions on this case as an authority. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #38
Why does it not include Dotard? He seems to have a pass on this whole thing. Tipperary Dec 2017 #17
forreal Puzzledtraveller Dec 2017 #19
Why is Mia Farrow a defender of Roman Polanski? kskiska Dec 2017 #22
What are you referring to? n/t pnwmom Dec 2017 #24
Yeah I never heard that one still_one Dec 2017 #26
It's commonly known. There are many sources. Just google it. kskiska Dec 2017 #29
Arts, Briefly; Mia Farrow Testifies For Roman Polanski oberliner Dec 2017 #39
Note, that's in 2005. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #40
Why has it spared that pussy grabbing fucking pig onecaliberal Dec 2017 #27
Because it has nothing to do with taking sides in your family drama. milestogo Dec 2017 #30
For my part, I can't watch anything he is a part of bhikkhu Dec 2017 #31
No kidding! What a creep Thekaspervote Dec 2017 #32
Maybe because it is old news LeftInTX Dec 2017 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dylan Farrow: Why has the...»Reply #34