Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Matt Taibbi: From an Unlikely Source, a Serious Challenge to Wall Street [View all]
from Rolling Stone:
Something very interesting is happening.
Theres been so much corruption on Wall Street in recent years, and the federal government has appeared to be so deeply complicit in many of the problems, that many people have experienced something very like despair over the question of what to do about it all.
But theres something brewing that looks like it might be a blueprint to effectively take on the financial services industry: a plan to allow local governments to take on the problem of neighborhoods blighted by toxic home loans and foreclosures through the use of eminent domain. I can't speak for how well the program will work, but it's certaily been effective in scaring the hell out of Wall Street.
Under the proposal, towns would essentially be seizing and condemning the man-made mess resulting from the housing bubble. Cooked up by a small group of businessmen and ex-venture capitalists, the audacious idea falls under the category of "Thats so crazy, it just might work!" One of the plans originators described it to me as a "four-bank pool shot." ..............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/from-an-unlikely-source-a-serious-challenge-to-wall-street-20120720#ixzz21IxBhKnt
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Matt Taibbi: From an Unlikely Source, a Serious Challenge to Wall Street [View all]
marmar
Jul 2012
OP
Ha Ha HA! Taibbi making shit up again. His "serious challenge" does not have
banned from Kos
Jul 2012
#4
Yes, it does. It's called 'taking action' on behalf of the PEOPLE this time, rather than the
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#9
Interesting, my girl-friend is having a similar problem, getting an attorney to represent her
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#42
Our dad's dads paid the car company, the builder (who got a loan, but his money was on the line),
jtuck004
Jul 2012
#66
I'd like to point out that an under-appreciated genius made a similar suggestion 2 1/2 years ago:
Orrex
Jul 2012
#5
Wow, that was brilliant, Orrex. You were ahead of the game. And it was a very good question at the
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#8
But the post didn't address the point made by TexasObserver. Is TexasObserver right?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#25
The fair market value of a foreclosed home is often a tiny fraction of its full sale value
Orrex
Jul 2012
#27
But that is not what happens in eminent domain. Properties are not auctioned. There is caselaw on
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#53
You cannot single out someone in a law like that, it would have to apply to all property owners.
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#58
You'd only be applying it to people who vacate properties and don't maintain them.
Orrex
Jul 2012
#59
You are correct, using MERS, the Banks removed any records of ownership from municipal record
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#21
They could take the banks to court and do what many home-owners are doing now, demand to see
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#30