Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

MrScorpio

(73,772 posts)
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 09:23 PM Jul 2012

By the NRA's strict definition, events leading up to the massacre were a 2nd Amnd success story [View all]

Holmes purchased everything that he wanted legally; all of his guns, ammo and equipment, without difficulty.

There was no government database alerting law enforcement on any of his purchases into a suspicious classification.

Holmes was never questioned about why he needed his weapons and 100 round cartridges by law enforcement before the slaughter.

He was able to make purchases on the internet without arousing the suspicion of the government.

Holmes was able to transport his weapons in his vehicle without government interference.

Had Holmes not killed and injured all those people in that theater, he would be free today to own and purchase as many weapons and ammo as he could afford and no one would think that it's unusual.

And most of all, in spite of this tragedy, NO POLITICIAN will lift a finger to pass ANY LAW that could bring the same kind of purchases to the attention of law enforcement in the future.

The next person who will inevitably slaughter people wholesale has either purchased his or her arsenal and ammo, or will purchase his or her arsenal and ammo, and up to the point at which he or she starts mowing people down, there's nothing out there to stop them.

The NRA has won, even if they are the last people to admit it.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Getting through to gun owners Historyprof77132 Jul 2012 #1
Welcome to DU, Prof MrScorpio Jul 2012 #2
Sounds to me you have forgotten recent history GarroHorus Jul 2012 #5
Welcome to DU! And yes we are screwed as long as the NRA runs things in this madinmaryland Jul 2012 #7
Welcome to DU nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #15
Welcome to the club primavera Jul 2012 #20
most of these people arm themselves to the teeth Historyprof77132 Jul 2012 #21
Todays NRA wouldn't want any reasonable laws... Archae Jul 2012 #3
Bingo! MrScorpio Jul 2012 #4
Holmes' right to make all of those purchases could not be infringed under the 5th and 2nd amendments GarroHorus Jul 2012 #6
Interesting but... Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #8
He should not have been denied a firearm GarroHorus Jul 2012 #9
I'm in full agreement Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #10
Sick. Even when the reality of so many death hits you in the face. morningfog Jul 2012 #11
It's not sick to support Constitutional rights SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #12
We should be able to regulate so that assault weapons morningfog Jul 2012 #13
Define assault weapon n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #16
We already do Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #17
The dead don't care about the trivial technical minutiae of firearms design. baldguy Jul 2012 #19
You guys really don't see the inconsistency here, do you? primavera Jul 2012 #22
+1000 smirkymonkey Jul 2012 #23
Sadly yes Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #14
Happens all the time. moondust Jul 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»By the NRA's strict defin...