Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Matt Taibbi: From an Unlikely Source, a Serious Challenge to Wall Street [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)20. Yes, but as the article points out, if this works the Banks will be back
and they can't pull out of everywhere.
This is basically the plan:
Desperate for a way out of a housing collapse that has crippled the region, officials in San Bernardino County
are exploring a drastic option using eminent domain to buy up mortgages for homes that are underwater.
Then, the idea goes, the county could cut the mortgages to the current value of the homes and resell the mortgages to a private investment firm, which would allow homeowners to lower their monthly payments and hang onto their property.
Then, the idea goes, the county could cut the mortgages to the current value of the homes and resell the mortgages to a private investment firm, which would allow homeowners to lower their monthly payments and hang onto their property.
It sounds appealing and as the article points out, it's not just San Bernadino that is showing an interest. Suffolk Co. LI is also interested, and apparently other areas of the country.
So what objection can the Banks have to a plan to improve the economy when they have nothing to offer but years of economic stagnation?
Maybe it is Congress who should be threatening the Banks now, with prosecutions and investigations for what they did. If small municipalities start the turnaround, then maybe Congress will get the message, that if they are going to just sit there protecting Wall Street while Main Street continues to decline, then Main Street will take matters into their own hands, and maybe, finally decide whose side they are on.
If the Banks had been willing to do the same thing, which they could have and should have, someone else would not have had to come up with a solution.
And it may also be time to reevaluate the other issues, such as Student Loans and Pensions etc. If this can be done with the housing market, someone is likely to come up with a way to start taking away those powers from Banks that are not willing to be part of the solution.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Matt Taibbi: From an Unlikely Source, a Serious Challenge to Wall Street [View all]
marmar
Jul 2012
OP
Ha Ha HA! Taibbi making shit up again. His "serious challenge" does not have
banned from Kos
Jul 2012
#4
Yes, it does. It's called 'taking action' on behalf of the PEOPLE this time, rather than the
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#9
Interesting, my girl-friend is having a similar problem, getting an attorney to represent her
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#42
Our dad's dads paid the car company, the builder (who got a loan, but his money was on the line),
jtuck004
Jul 2012
#66
I'd like to point out that an under-appreciated genius made a similar suggestion 2 1/2 years ago:
Orrex
Jul 2012
#5
Wow, that was brilliant, Orrex. You were ahead of the game. And it was a very good question at the
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#8
But the post didn't address the point made by TexasObserver. Is TexasObserver right?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#25
The fair market value of a foreclosed home is often a tiny fraction of its full sale value
Orrex
Jul 2012
#27
But that is not what happens in eminent domain. Properties are not auctioned. There is caselaw on
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#53
You cannot single out someone in a law like that, it would have to apply to all property owners.
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#58
You'd only be applying it to people who vacate properties and don't maintain them.
Orrex
Jul 2012
#59
You are correct, using MERS, the Banks removed any records of ownership from municipal record
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#21
They could take the banks to court and do what many home-owners are doing now, demand to see
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#30