Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

OneAngryDemocrat

(2,060 posts)
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 12:27 AM Jul 2012

There's an awful lof of Tea-Baggers Posting on DU... [View all]

I posted, earlier, a short treatise on right-wing terror.

The central theme of my piece was simple enough to wrap your head around:

"Conservatives will blame anything and everything (for the terrorism killing progressives in America) but modern-day conservatism, which preaches that liberals and democrats are the bona fide enemies of America and threats to the nation's very existence.

Only the most naive or apologetic of political observers could doubt that different right-wing conservatives would deal with the perceived threat liberals and democrats pose to them in different ways, and that some would, inevitably, resort to violence.

And as long as that is the case, as long as liberals and democrats are "the enemy" the bodies will continue to pile up."


I've received almost 100 responses, and a full half of them attempted to refute the conclusion I came to, namely that liberal democrats are surrounded and under siege from some heavily armed, blood-thirsty right-wingers.

But no one... NO ONE... challenged my assertion that "right-wing conservatives would deal with the perceived threat liberals and democrats pose to them in different ways, and that some would, inevitably, resort to violence."

I don't see how someone could accept my premise about conservative psychology, and NOT also accept my conclusions.

Yet... dozens have done just that.

Where's the disconnect? I can only assume that Tea Baggers, with their twisted, hypocritical world-view, are writing most of the responses here at the Democratic Underground.

And that's a damn shame.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fetishization of the "center." Scootaloo Jul 2012 #1
I gave up on educating the "right"... OneAngryDemocrat Jul 2012 #2
I had a similar result to you, when I made a post making close to the same point Scootaloo Jul 2012 #5
You Need To Enlist... OneAngryDemocrat Jul 2012 #7
It's "sir" actually... Scootaloo Jul 2012 #8
LOL!!! OneAngryDemocrat Jul 2012 #9
So the half of respondents who disagreed with you are "Tea baggers," because Skip Intro Jul 2012 #3
That's NOT What I said... OneAngryDemocrat Jul 2012 #6
I'm not sure if baggers would have understood your post 2pooped2pop Jul 2012 #14
How many of them used the word liberty? I've seen that a lot lately. nt Comrade_McKenzie Jul 2012 #4
Wow, somebody is channelling crazy-eyes Bachman. HooptieWagon Jul 2012 #10
And I'm Sorry... OneAngryDemocrat Jul 2012 #11
I just read your other OP RedStateLiberal Jul 2012 #12
Well said... OneAngryDemocrat Jul 2012 #13
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #15
what are you trying to say here? maddezmom Jul 2012 #17
Wrong. DU has a lot of vets, including combat vets of various eras. pinboy3niner Jul 2012 #18
Oh, please. Le Taz Hot Jul 2012 #16
If I had a nickel.. sendero Jul 2012 #19
What you're missing... pinboy3niner Jul 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There's an awful lof of T...