Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

questionseverything

(9,631 posts)
12. ei peops sued and won to get the digital images preserved,then late last night al supremes overturne
Tue Dec 12, 2017, 11:06 PM
Dec 2017

it

http://bradblog.com/?p=12395

Why not just fight to view the actual paper ballots? Brakey explains: "You cannot get at the original ballots. They will not let you touch them. In order to get to them, you have to prove fraud first. And how are you going to prove fraud if you can't get to the ballots? That's the Catch-22. The ballot images are a tool to get us to the originals.

Yes, they were. I took a Democratic Development course from Stanford and octoberlib Dec 2017 #1
Exactly. Sorry to see RAchel buying into this. She literally said they are always wrong and Amaryllis Dec 2017 #2
That's just lazy. Do some research, Rachel octoberlib Dec 2017 #4
It's not even logical to not ask the question why? Amaryllis Dec 2017 #7
All journalists ( with the exception of people like Greg Palast) octoberlib Dec 2017 #9
brad blog is good too questionseverything Dec 2017 #17
Octoberlib, could the extreme polarization and Hortensis Dec 2017 #38
I think its entirely possible. I thought one octoberlib Dec 2017 #39
Sounds like a very interesting course. Hortensis Dec 2017 #40
I took it in a MOOC! It was offered on Coursera. octoberlib Dec 2017 #41
Oh, thanks, Octoberlib. I'll go check it out. Hortensis Dec 2017 #44
Rachel is buyin into a hoax. triron Dec 2017 #3
all depends upon whose dogma you choose to believe: Gabi Hayes Dec 2017 #8
Yep. Final results not matching exit polls TDale313 Dec 2017 #6
Jimmy Carter has said that many times KelleyKramer Dec 2017 #24
Too bad Rachel made such an assumption without documentation to back her statement diva77 Dec 2017 #5
a lady on rachel's show just mentioned the lawsuit we lost last night about questionseverything Dec 2017 #10
Can you explain this flamingdem Dec 2017 #11
ei peops sued and won to get the digital images preserved,then late last night al supremes overturne questionseverything Dec 2017 #12
Thanks. This issue makes my blood boil flamingdem Dec 2017 #14
me too..i don't think hrc actually lost either wisconsin or michigan questionseverything Dec 2017 #16
I think it was stolen flamingdem Dec 2017 #18
Or PA; she didnt lose that either. Amaryllis Dec 2017 #28
She underperformed Josh Shapiro (D) DeminPennswoods Dec 2017 #34
info in the following op too questionseverything Dec 2017 #13
More info RandomAccess Dec 2017 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author diva77 Dec 2017 #21
I think most media people do not understand election integrity. It takes about 3 months to really diva77 Dec 2017 #20
you would thinks would of used the repubs nontransparency an issue questionseverything Dec 2017 #29
I've been saying this for years malaise Dec 2017 #19
In Germany, we treat exit polls almost like preliminary results Ezior Dec 2017 #22
you said it. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2017 #37
Rachel finally got something correct Awsi Dooger Dec 2017 #23
yah, the Election Reform forum was once filled with great discussions diva77 Dec 2017 #30
Agree! No one seems to do a scientific, logical, exam on why suddenly exit polls are always wrong. UCmeNdc Dec 2017 #25
Do you have data to demonstrate this claim? Loki Liesmith Dec 2017 #26
i personally remember in 2000 the pundits talking about how accurate exit polls "used to be," TheFrenchRazor Dec 2017 #32
Thats not data Lee-Lee Dec 2017 #42
Exit polls for so long were so reliable that they PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2017 #27
agreed, except you forgot election hacking as an explanation for the skewed exit polls. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2017 #36
started in 2000 i think, and they've been "wrong" ever since. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2017 #31
Results depend on when and where the exit polling is done DeminPennswoods Dec 2017 #33
how come they knew how to do it 20 years ago, but now it's a very inexact, "evolving" science, TheFrenchRazor Dec 2017 #35
Maybe they were not as good as everyone thinks they were two decades ago Lee-Lee Dec 2017 #43
20 years ago computers, internet, social media, cell DeminPennswoods Dec 2017 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel just said exit pol...»Reply #12