Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)

1. Would having to prove a need for a bullet a second

Reply to xchrom (Original post)

Sun Jul 22, 2012, 07:35 AM

Jul 2012

be " gun grabbing " . And is it legal to shoot 60 deer a minute? Did any teacher or any other human being have contact with this person in the last month?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Police: Colo. suspect planned massacre for months [View all] xchrom Jul 2012 OP

Would having to prove a need for a bullet a second orpupilofnature57 Jul 2012 #1

The 2nd Amendment has not a single thing to do with deer... pipoman Jul 2012 #6

Agreed ,canisters of death have no orpupilofnature57 Jul 2012 #8

Except millions have been sold pipoman Jul 2012 #9

a semi-automatic assault rifle used by the shooter jammed malaise Jul 2012 #2

And probably wouldn't have happened pipoman Jul 2012 #3

That's the good news malaise Jul 2012 #4

Especially the "drum" style ones. slampoet Jul 2012 #5

"months of planning" would have resulted pipoman Jul 2012 #7