Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

questionseverything

(11,688 posts)
16. the kn reference is about a clerk that after 3 days "discovered"
Wed Dec 13, 2017, 12:45 AM
Dec 2017

she had not reported an entire town...which changed the election

but I hope you are right

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Given the voter suppression laws... Wounded Bear Dec 2017 #1
folks that had to vote provisinal should take a voter back to vouch for them questionseverything Dec 2017 #8
What does the write in vote have to do with the outcome? If some are not allowed, what Tess49 Dec 2017 #2
nothing. sarah FAILIN Dec 2017 #3
Thanks. The media keeps talking about write-ins, and I couldn't figure out why? Tess49 Dec 2017 #11
because the write ins helped Jones win KelleyKramer Dec 2017 #23
Thanks. I suppose a write is like a non vote. Tess49 Dec 2017 #32
plans changed sarah FAILIN Dec 2017 #39
See, that's the part I don't understand. If Moore's name (or Jones's) was already on the ballot, Tess49 Dec 2017 #40
There won't be any changes sarah FAILIN Dec 2017 #41
A lot of theory was that Republicans felt damned if they did with either candidate... Akoto Dec 2017 #25
Happy they did that. Tess49 Dec 2017 #33
False. former9thward Dec 2017 #36
correct sarah FAILIN Dec 2017 #38
write ins were like 21,000 questionseverything Dec 2017 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2017 #35
Write-in votes are generally counted first... Wounded Bear Dec 2017 #9
I could have stated that more clearly in my OP. Thanks for clarifying. nt Atticus Dec 2017 #12
Thanks. nt Tess49 Dec 2017 #15
Not true. former9thward Dec 2017 #37
I wouldn't mind a forensic investigation of the optiscans -- probably would find diva77 Dec 2017 #4
i would love to see all of it questionseverything Dec 2017 #6
I'm so relieved that his delusional ass lost. nt ecstatic Dec 2017 #7
now is the time to watch the al sos for bs questionseverything Dec 2017 #10
no he pretty much said it's over. mucifer Dec 2017 #13
the kn reference is about a clerk that after 3 days "discovered" questionseverything Dec 2017 #16
Was that in the Scott Walker recall? KelleyKramer Dec 2017 #24
i thought prosser sc justice vote but questionseverything Dec 2017 #34
What a deplorable loser. No chance in hell but won't concede lunasun Dec 2017 #14
Tomorrow Trump will claim that 30,000 illegal aliens voted in Alabama world wide wally Dec 2017 #17
Lol MFM008 Dec 2017 #28
bannon told him to fight it elmac Dec 2017 #18
For Jones, welcome to the U.S. Senate. To Moore, banished to the waste bin of disgraced politiicans ffr Dec 2017 #19
Surely a tad tough for recounts when no ballots kept ... Puzzler Dec 2017 #20
Oh the irony.... Pachamama Dec 2017 #30
Indeed... little schaddenfreude anyone? Puzzler Dec 2017 #31
And Steve "Pig Pen" Bannon's streak continues unbroken! Buns_of_Fire Dec 2017 #21
Pig Pen is much cuter! Dulcinea Dec 2017 #42
From personal experience blue-wave Dec 2017 #22
Yes! Moore in 2020! Cicada Dec 2017 #26
i really hope that prevert dad helped. pansypoo53219 Dec 2017 #27
God works in mysterious ways Pachamama Dec 2017 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jones' victory is solid. ...»Reply #16