Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Drug testing for people on welfare? [View all]PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)40. Tell them that is costs too much.
The looks on wingnut faces when you cite Florida's experience (with stats to prove it) is priceless. it blows their entire argument -and- prejudices against poor people right out of the water!
This is from rucky's link:
From July through October in Florida the four months when testing took place before Judge Scrivens order 2.6 percent of the states cash assistance applicants failed the drug test, or 108 of 4,086, according to the figures from the state obtained by the group. The most common reason was marijuana use. An additional 40 people canceled the tests without taking them.
Because the Florida law requires that applicants who pass the test be reimbursed for the cost, an average of $30, the cost to the state was $118,140. This is more than would have been paid out in benefits to the people who failed the test, Mr. Newton said.
As a result, the testing cost the government an extra $45,780, he said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/us/no-savings-found-in-florida-welfare-drug-tests.html?_r=1
Because the Florida law requires that applicants who pass the test be reimbursed for the cost, an average of $30, the cost to the state was $118,140. This is more than would have been paid out in benefits to the people who failed the test, Mr. Newton said.
As a result, the testing cost the government an extra $45,780, he said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/us/no-savings-found-in-florida-welfare-drug-tests.html?_r=1
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've been in the same boat, and I would have definitely found it deameaning!
GreenPartyVoter
Jul 2012
#57
Plenty of jobs that require a drug test have nothing to do with hazardous conditions..
Fumesucker
Jul 2012
#25
I always tell them that members of Congress should be drug tested also. I've never had
Booster
Jul 2012
#28
We are living in a culture that deeply believes in guilt until innocence proven.
Trillo
Jul 2012
#33
It's just an opportunity for someone to make money at the testing company.
limpyhobbler
Jul 2012
#51
This also assumes that drug tests are infallible. Actually, there is a 5 to 10% false positive
Arkansas Granny
Jul 2012
#52