Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 12:41 AM Dec 2017

Buzzfeed: GSA Attorney says Mueller obtained Trump emails legally [View all]

https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/the-trump-campaign-claims-a-federal-office-illegally-turned?utm_term=.bdqMJJLnOy#.sbldYYW4j2

..."Career GSA staff, working with Mr. Loewentritt and at the direction of the FBI, immediately produced all the materials requested by the Special Counsel’s Office – without notifying TFA or filtering or redacting privileged material," Langhofer writes.

In a phone interview with BuzzFeed News on Saturday night, Loewentritt — whose LinkedIn represents that he has been at the agency since 1972 — disputed the claims made in the letter sent by the Trump campaign.

"Beckler never made that commitment," he said of the claim that any requests for transition records would be routed to the Trump campaign's counsel.

Specifically, Loewentritt said, "in using our devices," transition team members were informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions.


Loewentritt read to BuzzFeed News a series of agreements that anyone had to agree to when using GSA materials during the transition, including that there could be monitoring and auditing of devices and that, "Therefore, no expectation of privacy can be assumed."...

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, at worst, the e-mails can't be admitted at trial. Sophia4 Dec 2017 #1
I think you've got it backwards... regnaD kciN Dec 2017 #4
Yes. The worst would be if the judge decided not to allow some of them Sophia4 Dec 2017 #18
Yes, the emails can be suppressed at trial if a judge agrees, but marylandblue Dec 2017 #5
Ouch! calimary Dec 2017 #24
Because trump team wants to taint Mueller's work and get him thrown off the case. Otherwise shraby Dec 2017 #6
Mueller office determined a letter was sufficient. Roland99 Dec 2017 #2
In other words, both the GSA and Special Counsel agreed that no warrant was needed marylandblue Dec 2017 #8
Right wingers are scared... IluvPitties Dec 2017 #3
Well, it's not just what's in the e-mails... regnaD kciN Dec 2017 #7
A beautiful thing. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2017 #9
But the only thing they would have lied about marylandblue Dec 2017 #10
That makes sense. calimary Dec 2017 #23
Hope your scenario is correct. You make good.points. Alice11111 Dec 2017 #27
Welcome to DU, IluvPitties! calimary Dec 2017 #25
So, that pretty much puts Mueller and team in the clear on the emails. Akoto Dec 2017 #11
It doesn't even matter- dawg day Dec 2017 #15
The gang that can't shoot straight wouldn't know a law if it kicked them in the ass. greatauntoftriplets Dec 2017 #12
I've posted this elsewhere in a similar thread but TomSlick Dec 2017 #13
That's all they got? dawg day Dec 2017 #14
This is the letter that counsel to "Trump for America" sent to the Congressional committees DonaldsRump Dec 2017 #16
Even better. Where the lawyers safeinOhio Dec 2017 #17
Good question. Sophia4 Dec 2017 #20
The .gov emails are the best evidence they could come up with against Mueller. herding cats Dec 2017 #19
Geeez, how else would he do it, call Putin? L. Coyote Dec 2017 #21
"appropriate criminal process" equals "warrants given" joshcryer Dec 2017 #22
Of course we should expect them to fight back aggressively. Alice11111 Dec 2017 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Buzzfeed: GSA Attorney sa...