General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jason Alexander long twit on Assault Weapons [View all]Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)No the death total isn't 100,000 true. But it is easy when you are writing to get stats a bit mixed up. IMO it was an unintentional error. This stat means almost everyone knows someone who was either killed or injured by a gun. I have known at least 3 people killed or injured by guns. 2 killed and one injured. The one that was injured was a suicide attempt that failed, he ended up paralyzed from the neck down and has to live in a nursing home for the rest of his life. One of the dead was a 3 year old shot by his 7 year old brother when he found his dad's gun and was playing with it. The other was a homicide(very likely) yet ruled suicide by the local yokels he was in his 30's and involved in some dispute over raccoon pelts (for those that don't know back in the day they were worth 30 bucks a pelt and this guy was possibly murdered for several, can't remember how many).
Anyway here is the link with the 100,000 stat
http://bradycampaign.org/facts/gunviolence/
I am in my late 40's so I hope I don't have to hear about any other people in my community or my family that have been killed or injured by guns. The fact people can still argue for individual ownership of guns in the face of these statistics says more to me about the ugly underbelly of gun defenders than I want to know.