Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(12,662 posts)
11. The story is much more nuanced than the High Times title implies (likewise the OP's excerpts)
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 01:24 AM
Feb 2015

First, here it is from the source, the ap.org website itself:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MARIJUANA_TAXES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

In a quick read, its exactly the same story as the one in High Times -- no more and no less. Although AP's title is different,

"Tax Law Quirk Means Pot May Pay Off For Coloradans Literally"


That said, people should read the story in full, for example,
Even some pot shoppers are surprised [font color=red]Colorado may not keep the taxes that were promised to go toward school construction[/font] when voters legalized marijuana in 2012.

Legal weed has collided with the tax limitation movement because a 1992 voter-approved constitutional amendment called the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights requires all new taxes to go before voters.

The amendment also requires Colorado to pay back taxpayers when the state collects more than what's permitted by a formula based on inflation and population growth.

... Republicans concede that marijuana is throwing them off their usual position of wanting tax dollars returned to taxpayers. But they also tend to say that marijuana should pay for itself - that general taxes shouldn't pay for things like increased drug education and better training for police officers to identify stoned drivers. ((unfortunately the article nowhere indicates if those costs are anywhere near, more, or less, than the $50 million taxes collected, or to be collected year after year in the future. And of course RepubliCONs have a way of twisting things -- those costs could be, say $10 million in the first year, and $2 million annually thereafter, and RepubliCONs would still make it sound like its not paying for itself -- they tend to leave out inconvenient information --Progree))

... After legalizing marijuana in 2012, Colorado voters returned to the polls the following year and approved a 15 percent excise tax on pot for the schools and an additional 10 percent sales tax for lawmakers to spend.

[font color = red]Voters were told those taxes would generate about $70 million in the first year. The state now believes it will rake in about $50 million.[/font]


But because the economy is improving and other tax collections are growing faster, Colorado is obligated to give back much of what it has collected.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Imagine that. 99th_Monkey Feb 2015 #1
Great story - voters in other states need to know of this aint_no_life_nowhere Feb 2015 #2
K&R DeSwiss Feb 2015 #3
You and I obviously Aerows Feb 2015 #16
There is a budget surplus, but the marijuana tax revenue is only a small part of it progree Feb 2015 #17
Exactly. CentralMass Feb 2015 #18
That's what I thought too. AllyCat Feb 2015 #32
Agree Telcontar Feb 2015 #34
Of course! Newest Reality Feb 2015 #4
That is "High Times" former9thward Feb 2015 #5
That is "CNN" eShirl Feb 2015 #7
In fact, it's an AP article picked up by High Times NoGOPZone Feb 2015 #10
The story is much more nuanced than the High Times title implies (likewise the OP's excerpts) progree Feb 2015 #11
Damn, why is my state's way so lame in so many ways! freeplessinseattle Feb 2015 #6
I am just enjoying that it's legal marlakay Feb 2015 #9
Prohibition is a failed public policy, again. nt TeamPooka Feb 2015 #8
I am surprised that WA state is so incompetent at this. jtuck004 Feb 2015 #12
Late Breaking News forum rules requiring keeping the original title progree Feb 2015 #13
heh! BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2015 #14
As much pot as Oklahomans grow... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #15
Natural solution is to cut the pot tax. joshcryer Feb 2015 #19
$7.63 that could go to schools or services? frazzled Feb 2015 #20
That Rolling Stone summary of the AP article is way different than the AP article! progree Feb 2015 #21
How about having everyone with a single income below $50k or $100k married pay no state income tax? Crowman1979 Feb 2015 #22
Smoking POT doesn't affect memory, but POLITIC will! Johnny Rash Feb 2015 #23
Shifting the tax burden onto the working class with regressive taxes Taitertots Feb 2015 #24
How come it took so long for someone to say this . . . . Spooky69 Feb 2015 #25
If I had to guess. It is because non-smokers just don't care... Taitertots Feb 2015 #26
Are there not roads to be built? packman Feb 2015 #27
Talk about short sighted . . . . Spooky69 Feb 2015 #28
short sighted is what our country is these days demigoddess Feb 2015 #29
This may be great incentive for other states to do the same thing pathansen Feb 2015 #30
The problem is that the price of marijuana will skyrocket and corporate America >>> YOHABLO Feb 2015 #31
the $$$ surge won't last forever quadrature Feb 2015 #33
Up in smoke BadGimp Feb 2015 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pot Is Making Colorado So...»Reply #11