Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Pot Is Making Colorado So Much Money They Literally Have To Give Some Back To Residents [View all]progree
(12,662 posts)11. The story is much more nuanced than the High Times title implies (likewise the OP's excerpts)
First, here it is from the source, the ap.org website itself:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MARIJUANA_TAXES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
In a quick read, its exactly the same story as the one in High Times -- no more and no less. Although AP's title is different,
"Tax Law Quirk Means Pot May Pay Off For Coloradans Literally"
That said, people should read the story in full, for example,
Even some pot shoppers are surprised [font color=red]Colorado may not keep the taxes that were promised to go toward school construction[/font] when voters legalized marijuana in 2012.
Legal weed has collided with the tax limitation movement because a 1992 voter-approved constitutional amendment called the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights requires all new taxes to go before voters.
The amendment also requires Colorado to pay back taxpayers when the state collects more than what's permitted by a formula based on inflation and population growth.
... Republicans concede that marijuana is throwing them off their usual position of wanting tax dollars returned to taxpayers. But they also tend to say that marijuana should pay for itself - that general taxes shouldn't pay for things like increased drug education and better training for police officers to identify stoned drivers. ((unfortunately the article nowhere indicates if those costs are anywhere near, more, or less, than the $50 million taxes collected, or to be collected year after year in the future. And of course RepubliCONs have a way of twisting things -- those costs could be, say $10 million in the first year, and $2 million annually thereafter, and RepubliCONs would still make it sound like its not paying for itself -- they tend to leave out inconvenient information --Progree))
... After legalizing marijuana in 2012, Colorado voters returned to the polls the following year and approved a 15 percent excise tax on pot for the schools and an additional 10 percent sales tax for lawmakers to spend.
[font color = red]Voters were told those taxes would generate about $70 million in the first year. The state now believes it will rake in about $50 million.[/font]
But because the economy is improving and other tax collections are growing faster, Colorado is obligated to give back much of what it has collected.
Legal weed has collided with the tax limitation movement because a 1992 voter-approved constitutional amendment called the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights requires all new taxes to go before voters.
The amendment also requires Colorado to pay back taxpayers when the state collects more than what's permitted by a formula based on inflation and population growth.
... Republicans concede that marijuana is throwing them off their usual position of wanting tax dollars returned to taxpayers. But they also tend to say that marijuana should pay for itself - that general taxes shouldn't pay for things like increased drug education and better training for police officers to identify stoned drivers. ((unfortunately the article nowhere indicates if those costs are anywhere near, more, or less, than the $50 million taxes collected, or to be collected year after year in the future. And of course RepubliCONs have a way of twisting things -- those costs could be, say $10 million in the first year, and $2 million annually thereafter, and RepubliCONs would still make it sound like its not paying for itself -- they tend to leave out inconvenient information --Progree))
... After legalizing marijuana in 2012, Colorado voters returned to the polls the following year and approved a 15 percent excise tax on pot for the schools and an additional 10 percent sales tax for lawmakers to spend.
[font color = red]Voters were told those taxes would generate about $70 million in the first year. The state now believes it will rake in about $50 million.[/font]
But because the economy is improving and other tax collections are growing faster, Colorado is obligated to give back much of what it has collected.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pot Is Making Colorado So Much Money They Literally Have To Give Some Back To Residents [View all]
wildbilln864
Feb 2015
OP
There is a budget surplus, but the marijuana tax revenue is only a small part of it
progree
Feb 2015
#17
The story is much more nuanced than the High Times title implies (likewise the OP's excerpts)
progree
Feb 2015
#11
That Rolling Stone summary of the AP article is way different than the AP article!
progree
Feb 2015
#21
How about having everyone with a single income below $50k or $100k married pay no state income tax?
Crowman1979
Feb 2015
#22
The problem is that the price of marijuana will skyrocket and corporate America >>>
YOHABLO
Feb 2015
#31