Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Fritz67

(369 posts)

2. I guess she had to throw everyone off...

Reply to Ptah (Original post)

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 09:21 PM

Apr 2012

...and do something that actually sounds sane for once. Keep us guessing maybe.

I'm sure she'll do something Teabaggy in the extreme to make up for it, though.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Brewer vetoes guns in public buildings bill [View all] Ptah Apr 2012 OP

I can only guess that the reason she vetoed this Drale Apr 2012 #1

That's what I thought too Politicalboi Apr 2012 #8

Different take (still self-serving) salin Apr 2012 #15

I buy the money argument: it would cost too much to install metal detectors everywhere (nt) Recursion Apr 2012 #30

That makes no sense hack89 Apr 2012 #33

I guess she had to throw everyone off... Fritz67 Apr 2012 #2

I guess she's not a COMPLETE asshole. marmar Apr 2012 #3

? elleng Apr 2012 #4

Oops....I left out the word "not" ..... amended. marmar Apr 2012 #5

Thanks, mar; elleng Apr 2012 #13

well of course florida08 Apr 2012 #6

I suspect this had more to do with the money aspect more than anything. cstanleytech Apr 2012 #7

"OOhh, yummy, guns�" MrScorpio Apr 2012 #9

How would such a law stop a determined shooter? hack89 Apr 2012 #34

Because Jan could show up in the crosshairs. muntrv Apr 2012 #10

A momentary lapse into sanity. caseymoz Apr 2012 #11

What bullshit! The Constitution says guns everywhere 24/7, regardless of age or place! onehandle Apr 2012 #12

What business did people have that required carrying a gun into those buildings? Kolesar Apr 2012 #14

It's obvious you silly! Kelvin Mace Apr 2012 #16

If You Outlaw Guns In Public Buildings... you know the rest (n/t) wellst0nev0ter Apr 2012 #26

the question is... krkaufman Apr 2012 #18

This message was self-deleted by its author Kolesar Apr 2012 #21

Probably because of the elevated number of crazies COLGATE4 Apr 2012 #25

Will a law and a couple of signs stop those crazies? hack89 Apr 2012 #35

Well, the idea is that the woman with the deranged psycho ex who carries a gun in case he comes back Recursion Apr 2012 #29

What's good for the goose.... krkaufman Apr 2012 #17

Any reason why? I thought she'd be rooting for that. freshwest Apr 2012 #19

It would cost a lot to retrofit older government buildings Recursion Apr 2012 #28

Or conversely, the metal detectors would simply identify who is armed. Then they could show their freshwest Apr 2012 #31

Her letter to the House Speaker (pdf at her official website): pinboy3niner Apr 2012 #20

After Gabby Gifford, Brewer is a little leery of her local gun nuts jpak Apr 2012 #22

Why that no good commie swine! mikeSchmuckabee Apr 2012 #23

Just a ploy The Wizard Apr 2012 #24

So the right to bear arms is curtailed only where the curtailment can't be enforced? Recursion Apr 2012 #27

You are forgetting that "gun free zone" signs have magical properties. nt hack89 Apr 2012 #36

WILLIAM AYERS! Cosmocat Apr 2012 #32