Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RobinA

(10,478 posts)
17. Yeah, But...
Tue Feb 3, 2015, 01:29 PM
Feb 2015

It has to be what you say it is. My guess would be that the retailers (as an organization) didn't have a clue what was or was not in the stuff. Walgreens contracts with XYZ company for ginko and somebody either at the XYZ plant or a middle man, slaps a Walgreens label on the purported ginko and off it goes to the Walgreens store.

Walgreens then gets in trouble because they've got their ginko label in alfalfa. So then they have to sue XYZ for selling them alfalfa instead of ginko. XYZ probably then says that Walgreens knew it was alfalfa...and it's off to the races.

Stores do not make the stuff that has a store label on it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New York Attorney General...»Reply #17