Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
4. If anyone thought that sanctions would be a "quick and easy victory" they don't know much about
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 11:04 AM
Feb 2015

the history of economic sanctions anywhere in the world.

If a country wants to conduct a quick reaction to political events, the military is a much better choice - witness events in Crimea last spring. Russia did not just enforce economic sanctions on Ukraine in reaction to events in Kiev. Guys with guns got results in Crimea much faster than economic sanctions would have done.

Sanctions cause pain on both sides. Existing trade was beneficial to both sides or it would not have been happening. Stopping that trade then will obviously hurt both sides. There are many corporations and their conservative politicians who have argued against sanctions for precisely that reason. They knew they would feel the pain, too.

Sanctions are a viable, long term response to political events if you rule out a military response for moral or practical reasons and rule out not having any response at all (other perhaps than a sternly worded letter). Sanctions took years to work in South Africa. There is nothing 'quick and easy' about them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sanctions hurt Russia, bu...»Reply #4