Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Over 300 Economists Agree: It’s Time to Legalize Marijuana [View all]ieoeja
(9,748 posts)40. I have made the same argument. And it is worse.
I grew up in a county where the largest city has under 3000 residents. I live in Chicago which has just a wee bit more.
One of the things I have had to learn when visiting where I grew up is *not* to talk casually about marijuana use. Here in Chicago I know people from all political ideologies who smoke rather openly. They are blue collar, white collar and cops. They are wealthy, poor and everything in between. I wouldn't think anything of saying at a meeting, "you need to light up a joint when you go home tonight" to someone talking about being stressed out by work.
Let me say something like that where I grew up, and a solid majority of the people I know would be shocked and look at me like I just admitted to being a child molestor.
Heck, this very conversation - a debate on decriminalization - would be walking on thin ice where I grew up.
When they take the national polls, support in the Liberal areas combine with a minority in the Conservative regions to push the decriminalizing numbers over 50%. But if you break out those polls state-by-state, congressional district-by-district...?
I've never seen such a poll. But I would be really surprised if that showed 40+%, much less 50+%, supporting decriminalization in the vast majority of congressional districts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
the police industrial complex and its commander in chief will not like this or go along - cuts into
msongs
Apr 2012
#2
I watched one of the virtual people on tv the other night trying to rationalize the administration's
jtuck004
Apr 2012
#4
My questions about the meme about prohibition having ended mob rule are these:
JDPriestly
Apr 2012
#13
We don't outlaw everything that is bad for people. And alcohol is far worse for people than pot is.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2012
#18
Setting aside the fact that marijuana is probably not as damaging to our health
JDPriestly
Apr 2012
#58
More than that, the start (not end) of Prohibition *increased* alcohol consumption among women.
ieoeja
Apr 2012
#39
Question away, of course, but those weren't expected outcomes of the prohibition
jtuck004
Apr 2012
#20
THANK you. i was about to go google for this link, which tells the whole story
99th_Monkey
Apr 2012
#44
Thanks. "a confluence of treatment and risk reduction policies." That's good news.
JDPriestly
Apr 2012
#59
The reality is that anything that prohibits personal choice is a burden on the economy.
Gregorian
Apr 2012
#6
It will be part of the national conversation; it's on the ballot in two states.
Comrade Grumpy
Apr 2012
#11
Our 3 Dem. gubernatorial candidates were asked about it in the first televised
Tunkamerica
Apr 2012
#14
Yeah, NC. Meanwhile, 16 States plus DC already passed Medical Marijuana laws with
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2012
#29
Well, I was responding to the prvious poster who said it won't even be part of the
Tunkamerica
Apr 2012
#77
It only takes one lobbyist with a fat wallet that disagrees with them to keep it
Dragonfli
Apr 2012
#21