Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,750 posts)
61. No, nothing like Vancouver Island; the internationally recognised border
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 12:10 PM
Feb 2015

is that it's part of Georgia.

South Ossetia, Russian Yuzhnaya Osetiya, autonomous republic in Georgia that declared independence in 2008. Only a few countries—most notably Russia, which maintains a military presence in South Ossetia—recognize its independence. South Ossetia occupies the southern slopes of the Greater Caucasus mountains. The region is populated largely (about two-thirds) by Ossetes, a Caucasian people speaking an eastern Iranian language. (Many Ossetes also live in the neighbouring republic of North Ossetia–Alania in Russia, which occupies the northern slopes of the Greater Caucasus.) Most of the remaining inhabitants of South Ossetia are Georgians. Its capital is Tskhinvali. Pop. (1989) 98,500; (2005 est.) 49,200.
...
In the late 1980s a separatist movement emerged in South Ossetia that sought secession from Georgia and unification with North Ossetia–Alania. In 1989 Soviet troops were sent to maintain peace. Shortly after Georgia gained its independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, heavy fighting broke out between Ossetian and Georgian forces, forcing thousands to flee South Ossetia. In 1992 Russia helped broker a cease-fire—the terms of which called for peacekeeping forces from Georgia, Russia, North Ossetia–Alania, and South Ossetia—but the breakaway region’s status remained unresolved. In 1993 South Ossetia approved a constitution that established the region as a republic. Although not internationally recognized, it elected a president in 1996. Subsequent negotiations failed to end the conflict, and periodic fighting continued into the early 21st century.

Although South Ossetia emphasized its desire for independence in an unofficial referendum in late 2006, such status was unrecognized by the international community, and the territory remained legally part of Georgia. Hostilities between South Ossetia and Georgia—and, more broadly, between Georgia and Russia—escalated rapidly in August 2008, when Georgian troops engaged with local separatist fighters, as well as with Russian forces that had crossed the border there with the stated intent to defend Russian citizens and peacekeeping troops already in the region. In the days that followed, Russian forces took control of Tskhinvali, the South Ossetian capital, and fighting continued to spread to other parts of the country—including Abkhazia, a second separatist region, located along the Black Sea coast in northwestern Georgia. Georgia and Russia signed a French-brokered cease-fire that called for the withdrawal of Russian forces, but tensions continued. Russia’s subsequent recognition of the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia was condemned by Georgia and met with criticism from other members of the international community.



http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/556319/South-Ossetia

It might be the simplest thing for Georgia to say "OK, Russia successfully invaded South Ossetia, the people that are left would be happier in Russia, Putin can have it", but that doesn't mean that when Russia sent its troops into South Ossetia and attacked Georgian troops, it was OK. This sub-thread was about when western suspicions of Russia resurfaced, and a major answer to that is "when it attacked the sovereign territory of another country".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Turnabout is fair play Demeter Feb 2015 #1
It is the media forwarding government war talk and creating tension..it is what they do to control thought. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #3
What makes you Snow Leopard Feb 2015 #35
"Ukraine conflict: UK joins Nato exercise in Poland"--BBC KoKo Feb 2015 #48
I'm curious Fred.... do you have any criticism for the Russians.... Adrahil Feb 2015 #70
Cameron "and his minions" in Europe want to stir up fear for political gain, so does Putin. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #71
Thanks for the reply. n/t Adrahil Feb 2015 #76
when have we done that lately Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #15
we do that every day, and have since the 50s. olddad56 Feb 2015 #50
Proof, no we do not Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #56
The Navy still flies these missions, I would have to believe that the AF does also. olddad56 Feb 2015 #78
I guess Russia is just very quiet about this Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #79
The Navy doesn't fly nuclear capable bombers along Russia's coastline, GGJohn Feb 2015 #83
The US Navy turns off their transponders and interferes with Russian aviation right on their border? EX500rider Feb 2015 #94
Ummm, no we don't. GGJohn Feb 2015 #74
Yes, they are breaking rules... Number9Dream Feb 2015 #42
Well, it is the latest in an ongoing string of incidents Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #72
The interception of the Bears comes a fortnight after similar aircraft flew into the English Channel Cha Feb 2015 #2
I have to say I am surprised by your opinions regarding Russia. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #5
Backatcha Fred. Cha Feb 2015 #8
When exactly did Russia become a mortal enemy again and the Cold War start anew? Sabre rattling Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #11
We differ.. you're not going to change how I feel about Putin and I'm not interested in changing Cha Feb 2015 #13
I am not going to attempt to change it then, but can it be explained? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #14
Because Russia ignored their Ukrainian agreement and invaded anyway 7962 Feb 2015 #16
Senator Inhofe has some allies I see. Anything to start a war....interesting. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #19
well if Russia had not invaded Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #27
Fred is uninterested in actual dialogue Android3.14 Feb 2015 #47
Did you like the 'evidence' of Senator Inhofe? That does not bother you? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #49
Wow, those pretty pictures add SO MUCH to your argument. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2015 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #73
clearly, you have no clue what you are talking about ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2015 #89
And then Fred posts unrelated material Android3.14 Feb 2015 #63
The Obama admin and UN reports confirm that Russia has sent tanks, and has shelled Ukr. positions NickB79 Feb 2015 #90
When exactly did mole hills become mountains? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #91
The unprovoked invasion of a foreign nation and thousands dead is a mole hill to you? NickB79 Feb 2015 #92
All strawmen are interesting and easily knocked down. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #93
For me, it began when Russia violated the Budapest Memorandum of 1994. ColesCountyDem Feb 2015 #39
That Agreement only addresses the use of weapons AGAINST the Ukraine happyslug Feb 2015 #57
It also assures territorial integrity. ColesCountyDem Feb 2015 #64
OK, here's a LOT of proof for you. How can you say Russia isnt using weapons against Ukraine?? 7962 Feb 2015 #80
Was it when they attacked Georgia in 2008? muriel_volestrangler Feb 2015 #43
Didn't Georgia attack first? happyslug Feb 2015 #53
The problem was South Ossetia is part of Georgia, not Russia (nt) muriel_volestrangler Feb 2015 #54
The people of South Osseia think otherwise and have been de facto independent since 1992. happyslug Feb 2015 #59
No, nothing like Vancouver Island; the internationally recognised border muriel_volestrangler Feb 2015 #61
A lot of people are channelling a well known Republican... MattSh Feb 2015 #26
They should just completely ignore them n2doc Feb 2015 #4
What? Why would Russia do that? Really? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #7
I'm not saying that they would n2doc Feb 2015 #10
It has been going on for 50 years like this..it is what huge bored militaries do. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #12
Exactly, much ado about nothing. NATO probably does it at a 10 to 1 ratio. A Simple Game Feb 2015 #40
Which is no doubt duly reported as a great fright in those countries as well. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #41
Oh, no doubt. n/t A Simple Game Feb 2015 #58
We scramble fighters to escort because the bombers have their transponders off. jeff47 Feb 2015 #66
So would the USA.... MattSh Feb 2015 #28
Matsh please cite your source I am not aware of such irisblue Feb 2015 #33
For the millionth time: Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #38
The best I can do... MattSh Feb 2015 #69
So you dont believe Russian troops are fighting & dying in Ukraine? 7962 Feb 2015 #81
America has a military presence or actual bases in 133 countries and spies on them all. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #36
Marine Le Pen tends to echo your positions.... Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #37
Better yet: issue statement saying that the pilots' requests for asylum were denied. Orsino Feb 2015 #62
Oh, THAT would be a good one. 7962 Feb 2015 #82
This is a return to "Cold War" tactics TexasProgresive Feb 2015 #6
You are playing into the media fear factory...do you not remember 2003 at all? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #9
Fred, Cha is correct. Nitram Feb 2015 #17
Why are you a MIC apologist? Why not question the propaganda? On Russia and Putin only, the media Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #18
Is it propaganda that Russia has sent bombers on a path towards the UK? Nitram Feb 2015 #20
Check your history on how often such stuff happens. Or not, and stick with your error. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #22
Exactly, you have to fall back on "history" to find an example. Nitram Feb 2015 #31
Good grief.....you do know which party is not a fan of history? Again, that would explain the fright. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #32
Fred fools fewer and fewer on DU with every passing day. Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #34
Actually, it's really not about sulphurdunn Feb 2015 #51
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2015 #87
Bottom line, Russia is playing a very dangerous game. CanonRay Feb 2015 #21
Are you scared? Then mission accomplished for the UK con government. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #23
Did I say I was scared? CanonRay Feb 2015 #24
Ditto. Very scary "bad ending", no? Terrifying! Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #25
Now I understand why we have an Ignore List. Dasvidaniya! CanonRay Feb 2015 #29
I am honored. I have honored 17 on my list. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #30
I imagine many people, lacking a substantive and objective premise... LanternWaste Feb 2015 #44
Agreed. Some half-wits will never get informed enough to form a rational position. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #46
What's that passing over your head? (nt) jeff47 Feb 2015 #68
Would it be this? GGJohn Feb 2015 #84
russia has had enough 'practice' with all their new military gear in Ukraine. Sunlei Feb 2015 #45
"Poland Asks Nato to Station 10,000 Troops On its Territory for Permanent Deployment" KoKo Feb 2015 #55
The Brits should have sent up Sophwith Camels to deal with prop bombers JPZenger Feb 2015 #60
Those contra-rotating propellers are wicked cool and just the ticket for long range flights Brother Buzz Feb 2015 #65
The props are for range. jeff47 Feb 2015 #67
Russian bomber flew inland over Cornwall, witness claims Bosonic Feb 2015 #75
Hmmm, that puts a new light on it. Turborama Feb 2015 #85
Worn out cold war crap. nt ladjf Feb 2015 #77
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2015 #86
planesandstuff: Bear Hunting mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2015 #88
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»RAF jets intercept Russia...»Reply #61