Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Government Backs Off From Banning Assault Rifle Bullet [View all]sir pball
(5,231 posts)47. While it is quite popular, it's most definitely junk. Least accurate thing I've ever used.
Without getting overly long winded, I've personally tested it in my bolt-action tackdriver and cheapo Wolf 62 is markedly better, let alone quality brand-name stuff.
That being said, I didn't think the proposal was a good idea, and if fools wish to part with their money via artificially overpriced cases of M855, it's none of my business to stop them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
wow--way less than 1/10 of 1 percent of the adult population is NOT a "big percentage."
niyad
Mar 2015
#5
"(H)ow do you know no support letters were sent?" Undoubtedly, some were
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2015
#14
Where were the "grassroots gun safety organizations" during all this?
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2015
#15
Asleep, apparently. No wonder they can't win, despite all the noise they make
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2015
#17
How should notice and comment rules operated under the Administrative Procedure Act?
jberryhill
Mar 2015
#3
Ya but then again getting a bullet ban past the scotus could be next to impossible.
cstanleytech
Mar 2015
#11
What did *your* email to the ATF say? How many others did you get to write them?
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2015
#67
This was a brilliant marketing strategy to get people to buy basically junk that has no market.
greatlaurel
Mar 2015
#8
M855 ammunition isn't "junk", is legal in New Jersey, and was already quite popular
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2015
#16
While it is quite popular, it's most definitely junk. Least accurate thing I've ever used.
sir pball
Mar 2015
#47
Wait, as if *any* centerfire rifle (.308, 30-30, .30-06, .243, etc) wouldn't pierce a typical vest??
X_Digger
Mar 2015
#9
"Amid a massive astroturfed outcry from the gun lobby and its impotent stooges..."
Orsino
Mar 2015
#27
The gun owners were driven to reflexive anger by the astroturfing of the gun lobby.
Orsino
Mar 2015
#45
He doesn't have or wield anywhere near the influence of the gun lobby. No one does.
Orsino
Mar 2015
#79
Explain why, then, in the colorado recalls bloomberg outspent gun rights groups by a factor of 5-1
beevul
Mar 2015
#80
Any annoyance caused by your insults is well soothed by the knowledge of your political inefficacy
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2015
#62
Well I Hope The Signature's For The Iran 47 Petition Spur This Kind Of Action...
Corey_Baker08
Mar 2015
#36
Yes, and by that math Democrats are supported by something like 16% of the electorate.
former9thward
Mar 2015
#73
It's very easy to 'game' the Gov.s public comments section.good media company w/ macro program.
Sunlei
Mar 2015
#82
And yet the gun control groups haven't "gamed" the .gov public comment section,
Lurks Often
Mar 2015
#85