Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Was he the guy we traded strawberries Mar 2015 #1
You would prefer he remain with the captors? blm Mar 2015 #2
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #5
So you don't believe in leaving no soldier behind, then tishaLA Mar 2015 #6
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #13
Great lesson: we show had bad it is to desert fellow soldiers tishaLA Mar 2015 #15
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #40
It appears to be no more effective a lesson not to desert tishaLA Mar 2015 #42
Besides, charged is not the same as convicted. Punishment is supposed to *follow*, not precede tblue37 Mar 2015 #134
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #50
Jury Results stone space Mar 2015 #51
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #65
You got a link to that rule? Brother Buzz Mar 2015 #67
This message was self-deleted by its author GGJohn Mar 2015 #98
Good Grief.. No doubt! Rofl Cha Mar 2015 #104
I have never heard of that rule. Besides, it's not as though the jurors' names are tblue37 Mar 2015 #135
Nor has Skinner Brother Buzz Mar 2015 #139
Are you a new administrator of this site? Sheldon Cooper Mar 2015 #68
Oh? Why is that? This isn't Stalinist Russia! DU is pretty darn open forum. Everybody on MIRT, for.. marble falls Mar 2015 #69
dafuq NuclearDem Mar 2015 #72
I was the alerter, not a Juror, and anybody here is free to put me on their Jury Backlist. stone space Mar 2015 #74
Just curious, did you have a problem with stevenleser's comment on your alert and.... Brother Buzz Mar 2015 #75
"Gloating" is an odd characterization of Juror #2's verdict and comment. (nt) stone space Mar 2015 #80
How does posting results compromise the jurors' anonymity when their identities are not revealed? nt tblue37 Mar 2015 #136
It doesn't Brother Buzz Mar 2015 #140
HEre's the result of my alert on your post that claimed TOS rules that don't exist....5-2 msanthrope Mar 2015 #84
Good.. I think a HIDE is warranted for spreading false information so blatantly. TY,M Cha Mar 2015 #105
Just doing my part. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #119
Jury results pintobean Mar 2015 #85
Waaaaay over the line.Self delete! marble falls Mar 2015 #66
Soldier DustyJoe Mar 2015 #71
If he "removed his 'soldier' identity," I guess that means there will be no court martial tishaLA Mar 2015 #78
Totally Agree DustyJoe Mar 2015 #83
You're agreeing with yourself, not me tishaLA Mar 2015 #86
Well said. N/t BojackFan Mar 2015 #102
Why? blm Mar 2015 #9
Because Elmergantry Mar 2015 #12
That wasn't established. It was established that he had vulnerabilities blm Mar 2015 #16
well then Elmergantry Mar 2015 #20
It will go to court. I'm merely responding to thoughtless posts with logic blm Mar 2015 #23
The Obama Admin Elmergantry Mar 2015 #30
That's absurd. I suppose Bush Admin MUST have known that some soldiers blm Mar 2015 #33
Not absurd at all. Elmergantry Mar 2015 #46
They also claimed that 8 soldiers were killed searching for him and that proved blm Mar 2015 #47
The Obama Administration is not judge and jury. hamsterjill Mar 2015 #45
I don't understand why some don't get blm Mar 2015 #48
But they sure would want that system of justice if it were them on the hot seat hamsterjill Mar 2015 #49
If you knew anything about the case you would know that Obama based his decision on the full RBInMaine Mar 2015 #63
I've taken some truly horrible advice. Igel Mar 2015 #87
".. we don't leave troops on the battlefield. We get them out, and then let military justice do its Cha Mar 2015 #107
".. we don't leave troops on the battlefield. We get them out, and then let military justice do its Cha Mar 2015 #106
So, sentence a US soldier to probable torture and eventual death... gcomeau Mar 2015 #10
Just like Barack and American Muslims killed on foreign soil by Drones. No trial, no jury. n/t BP2 Mar 2015 #41
I suppose that shift can make one feel clever….however... blm Mar 2015 #43
You join terrorists on foreign soil, you have no right to a trial. Sorry. 7962 Mar 2015 #54
wrong place, sorry, 7962 Cha Mar 2015 #109
I was referring to the post criticizing Obama's drone program, not Bergdahl nt 7962 Mar 2015 #112
Sorry, I meant "wrong place" for my post.. It was a self-delete kind of thing. Cha Mar 2015 #114
No worries!! 7962 Mar 2015 #115
And also wrong. truebluegreen Mar 2015 #95
You didn't answer the question. Cha Mar 2015 #108
So you think we should just outsource the UCMJ to terrorists? jberryhill Mar 2015 #24
It's a question of how appropriate the deal is... Oktober Mar 2015 #56
You make the best point Oktober Yupster Mar 2015 #128
Glad you think so... Oktober Mar 2015 #129
No Quackers Mar 2015 #35
You care so much about our military but you've never heard of PTSD? nt stevenleser Mar 2015 #52
Our military NewEnglandGirl Mar 2015 #76
Sure HassleCat Mar 2015 #7
I would prefer strawberries Mar 2015 #11
So YOUR terms were doable at the time? blm Mar 2015 #17
I did not, but I strawberries Mar 2015 #22
LOL - Oh really? Funny, since the Pentagon said that never happened. blm Mar 2015 #27
oh the pentagon said it strawberries Mar 2015 #28
Well, tell us what the 'families' told you personally, strawberries. blm Mar 2015 #31
Here is two, strawberries Mar 2015 #34
You spoke with both families personally and they told you…. blm Mar 2015 #37
give it a rest strawberries Mar 2015 #38
I'm calmer than a cucumber and asking you to back up your statements. blm Mar 2015 #39
Cool stories, little fella... LanternWaste Mar 2015 #59
thanks big guy? nt strawberries Mar 2015 #61
No more replies from that poster, I'm afraid cyberswede Mar 2015 #122
I am calmly saying awoke_in_2003 Mar 2015 #81
Except that in many cases the waters are a bit muddied. Igel Mar 2015 #88
I think you'd better cease with the "talking down" and explain your remarks if you MADem Mar 2015 #121
I think it's sad that their deaths are being used for RW political-attack fodder. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #91
If it is true Elmergantry Mar 2015 #32
Anyone actually following the story knew that did NOT happen. blm Mar 2015 #36
As usual it is up to interpretation and agenda... Oktober Mar 2015 #44
bwahahahaha!! frylock Mar 2015 #62
"Leave no man behind" truebluegreen Mar 2015 #8
Naaa. christx30 Mar 2015 #64
Didn't say it should be his total punishment. truebluegreen Mar 2015 #94
If someone commits an armed christx30 Mar 2015 #137
What should be the punishment for the army taking in a mentally/emotionally unsuitable recruit? truebluegreen Mar 2015 #138
Oh looky Android3.14 Mar 2015 #18
yes I am special strawberries Mar 2015 #19
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #96
First, leave no one behind means leave no one behind. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #73
Interesting HassleCat Mar 2015 #3
Forrest Gump mybuddy Mar 2015 #4
Some go in with mental disorders and return in worsened states. blm Mar 2015 #14
Well, you can claim anything you want about Forrest Gump and the people he saved Android3.14 Mar 2015 #21
That was not a documentary, incidentally jberryhill Mar 2015 #25
That is a fictional character, right? Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2015 #26
He wasn't the only one that walked away, Historic NY Mar 2015 #29
This was going to blow up from the start. There were many other ways to get him back, 7962 Mar 2015 #53
What other ways? We couldn't TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #57
There were back channel connections we should've used that we'd used in the past. 7962 Mar 2015 #58
Four ways to go: 1-- leave him there until they kill him or he commits TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #60
Seems appropriate in this case madville Mar 2015 #55
charged but not convicted. What would have happened if he wasn't 'captured'? Sunlei Mar 2015 #70
They need to let things proceed in the most fair way possible--including TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #77
Agreed. 100%. He still can't even bear to see his family riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #89
Well Done, TG.. Excellent analysis. Cha Mar 2015 #110
Desertion is a serious crime. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #79
This post certainly attracted right wing scum abelenkpe Mar 2015 #82
Agreed. You know it's all political, no one cared about this guy until TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #93
Sure they did. PeteSelman Mar 2015 #101
BINGO!!!!! blm Mar 2015 #116
Yes it did, and should be noted by all. Darb Mar 2015 #97
40+ years in the Army and I say let the military justice system take it's course. GGJohn Mar 2015 #99
Military prosecutors have an over 90% conviction rate NobodyHere Mar 2015 #90
Done? TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #92
All prosecutors, civilian or otherwise, have an over 90% conviction rate. former9thward Mar 2015 #141
Good thing they support Bowe back home. Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #100
What's atrocious about it? Oktober Mar 2015 #113
You mean you don't know? Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #125
+1,000 Bohunk68 Mar 2015 #127
I'm glad we got him back gwheezie Mar 2015 #103
Well this certainly took the press away from Ted Cruz! B Calm Mar 2015 #111
And the whole Iran letter treason. Hugin Mar 2015 #117
The real traitors walk free at the expense of an mentally disturbed enlisted man. B Calm Mar 2015 #118
Well, this thread went to shit in a hurry! But back to the topic, he is CHARGED, not CONVICTED. MADem Mar 2015 #120
Desertion from an unjust war is a public service. Larry Engels Mar 2015 #123
I can guarantee you that the people who will decide his fate will not agree with you. MADem Mar 2015 #124
If I was in Bergdahl's seat NobodyHere Mar 2015 #130
I suspect he's ALREADY explicitly admitted guilt during those interrogations while he was MADem Mar 2015 #131
Bowe cooperated with the Army investigators when he returned to the U.S. Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #132
He may not have thought he was admitting guilt, but if, as the earlier reports suggest, MADem Mar 2015 #133
The real scandal here Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #126
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bowe Bergdahl Charged Wit...»Reply #19