Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Russia threatens to use 'nuclear force' over Crimea and the Baltic states [View all]NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)58. No, you clearly don't.
I was opposed to military intervention in Syria, but Russia's reluctance to pressure Assad into disarming its chemical weapons made a threat of military action the only recourse available.
Only when the Mediterranean fleet was on its way did Putin finally convince Assad to give up his weapons.
So, no, I was never in favor of military intervention in Syria. I was in favor of a diplomatic solution, one that Putin made damn near impossible until the last minute.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Russia threatens to use 'nuclear force' over Crimea and the Baltic states [View all]
7962
Apr 2015
OP
You do not believe that Russia's recent activities are only further encouraging
PersonNumber503602
Apr 2015
#19
"George Bush in Disguise" LOLOLOLOL When they have nothing to refute your facts.. they resort to
Cha
Apr 2015
#67
Seeking legal prosecutions against perceived deserters is not a military threat.
Scootaloo
Apr 2015
#87
Not a military threat, fine, but what's the purpose of bringing up old Soviet issues
NuclearDem
Apr 2015
#90
Yeah, it's not like invading and annexing part of another country is at all provocative.
Adrahil
Apr 2015
#33
so who said this? who heard it said? names please and proof would be useful as well nt
msongs
Apr 2015
#6
Much as it's easy to notice the obvious patterns coming from Russian state-owned media.
LanternWaste
Apr 2015
#40
Putin should be declared incompetent and replaced by those in power in Russia.
Major Hogwash
Apr 2015
#7
You seem disappointed that we aren't into WW III. What response do you think
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#11
Yeah, their little red herring strawmen are RIDICULOUS.. are you just so "disappointed
Cha
Apr 2015
#69
This is simply another confirmation that we are *both* pushing each other's buttons.
newthinking
Apr 2015
#13
Russia has an absolute, unambiguous and current obligation to leave the Baltics alone.
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#43
My Latvian grandparents ended up in a displaced persons camp in Germany after the war.
NuclearDem
Apr 2015
#91
He doesn't deny that he'd try to launch a soft invasion of the Baltics though.
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#41
I guess by pedagogy I meant that Putin was trying to teach Europe and North
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#50
Doesn't matter if you believe the media or not.. we have a personal anecdote that verifies from a
Cha
Apr 2015
#68
same countries the nazis devastated and the russians vultured in and never fully left.
Sunlei
Apr 2015
#60