Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Mechanicville child pornographer gets lifetime sentence [View all]Orrex
(67,111 posts)78. Spare me.
You can rationalize it however you want, but you're still explicitly pro-death-penalty. I see it and others here see it. You're the only one who doesn't see it, in fact, or at least pretends not to see it.
The way it goes down in real life is that the person who takes revenge is always someone with a personal stake in the matter.
Sure. Like Jack Ruby, for instance. And even if it's true, it's irrelevant; you're arguing in favor of summary executions.
Pretending that there is some wide universe of cases where it is otherwise is a fantasy scenario with no relevance to the real world.
If you really meant "someone with a personal stake in the matter," then you should admit that you were being disingenuous in reply #8 when you declared your intent to acquit "some random person" who acts as vigilante executioner.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hmmm I'm waiting for the hypocrites who claim to be anti death penalty to chime in
cstanleytech
Apr 2015
#3
So your only against the death penalty if a jury makes the decision after a trial???
cstanleytech
Apr 2015
#36
I disagree, there just some things that a prosecutor cannot control and the universe is one of them.
cstanleytech
Apr 2015
#94
No there are plenty of cases where the "alleged" killer is known guilty at the start
7962
Apr 2015
#51
What assertion? Those were your words shooting your alleged anti death penalty stance
cstanleytech
Apr 2015
#48
Ok lets call it what it is then.....murder. Either you are for it or not simple as that.
cstanleytech
Apr 2015
#57
I am as cynical as they come, yet even I don't expect to see such defense for him here
Dragonfli
Apr 2015
#7
Being against rape means being against all forms of rape, against all victims.
NuclearDem
Apr 2015
#38
It's not sympathy for child rapists, it's disgust for someone advocating rape and torture
Scootaloo
Apr 2015
#98
so half-witted as to be unable to determine the difference between sympathy for a rapist and the jus
LanternWaste
Apr 2015
#105
I can't help but wonder, what kind of mother thinks it's okay to have a middle-aged man babysit
scarletwoman
Apr 2015
#16
However, it WAS a man in this case, which is why I'd like to know the backstory.
scarletwoman
Apr 2015
#47
If it were my own father, or my own brother, or my own son, I could see it - as long as I actually
scarletwoman
Apr 2015
#58
Yes, I read that. But how and why did she pick THIS particular guy to "babysit"?
scarletwoman
Apr 2015
#72
Fine. Please tell me what percentage of pedophiles are females vs. males. nt
scarletwoman
Apr 2015
#62
If only as a society this 58 yr old would not have fallen through the cracks for help. First as an
Sunlei
Apr 2015
#80
More than 10 years ago, here, a man in his 70's committed suicide the night before his trial
SharonAnn
Apr 2015
#82