Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: Jury Finds Tsarnaev Guilty (All 30 Counts) in Boston Marathon Bombing [View all]WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)36. Tsarnaev's lawyer
pointed at him in the opening statements and said "He did it."
So what's your fucking point?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
BREAKING: Jury Finds Tsarnaev Guilty (All 30 Counts) in Boston Marathon Bombing [View all]
Hissyspit
Apr 2015
OP
Plenty of company on the false flag thing. Beck, Jones, Kokesh, the Pauls. n/t
freshwest
Apr 2015
#57
That he himself admitted it is an unpopular truth at times. It's more than possible that he simply
freshwest
Apr 2015
#68
A trial in a place where there are no unbiased jurors. Then kill him. America the beautiful. n/t
jtuck004
Apr 2015
#33
Being in a town of people who think they are better than him. They aren't. lol. n/t
jtuck004
Apr 2015
#50
You are conversing with people who can't connect two dots with a paint roller.
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#56
His own lawyer broadcast to the world that he is guilty. What was the purpose of this circus?
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#54
The legal system, with it's lawyers, is designed to be adversarial system, where both sides
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#61
Due Process is not a circus. The lawyers attempted every other manuever for him. The admission of
freshwest
Apr 2015
#62
"The lawyers attempted every other manuever for him." Baseless nonsense. They failed as
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#63
Then he did not have a lawyer representing him, he had an assistant prosecutor. If the lawyer was
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#75
The job of a defense attorney is NOT to have his client declared not guilty...
brooklynite
Apr 2015
#79
I reject your fait accompli premise because it assumes a presumption of guilt which is ok for you
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#81
Your comparison is a clever one. But beyond rhetorical value the two cases are immensely different.
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#84
That is a false dichotomy. For experts they don't appear to know what they are doing.
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#87