Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Jeb Bush Backs Hike in Social Security Retirement Age [View all]progree
(13,090 posts)25. I don't give a FF what Bill did. He's not running AFAIK. As for Hillary, you should back up what
you say if you wish to have any credibility, and not just being another worthless polemicist.
And by the way, I probably don't like Hillary any more than you do ( http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6520767 ). But around here "IIRC" blah blah doesn't convince anyone of anything.
12. IIRC, Clinton's also on record to raise the age and/or cut benefits to address the fully-fake crisis! crisis! in Social Security.
20. In 2008, Hillary was prattling on about the need to "reform" Social Security or some such crap, without raising taxes.
Oh, so you did some research after the "IIRC" in response #12 -- at least you got it down to a specific year. Maybe you can share the link. Though in #12 you were pretty specific in what you IIRC'd [font color = blue]"raise the age and/or cut benefits"[/font], while in #20, though you've got a specific year, suddenly the prescription is a bit more vague [font color = blue]"the need to 'reform' Social Security or some such crap, without raising taxes"[/font].
And whether it is a crisis or not, the projections are that Social Security will not be able to pay promised benefits after 2033 (18 years from now), and those projections have been trending to an earlier and earlier trust fund exhaustion date. Maybe you can tell us why that's not a problem.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Which Clinton? I hadn't heard that one before. (wouldn't be surprised though) nm
progree
Apr 2015
#15
I don't give a FF what Bill did. He's not running AFAIK. As for Hillary, you should back up what
progree
Apr 2015
#25
There is already a sliding scale in place, adding time to when you can retire, with full benefits.
SoapBox
Apr 2015
#14
Yes. I think the so-called full retirement age maxes out at 67 for people born in 1960 and later
progree
Apr 2015
#16
25 is for college people. If you are not in that group, you probably started working at 16
LiberalArkie
Apr 2015
#18
Only the affluent are living longer. The trend among lower income people is negative.
LongTomH
Apr 2015
#34
How about raising the cap instead of trying to deny Social Security benefits to folks, hoping they
still_one
Apr 2015
#28
And of course no one that wants to "fix" Social Security, mentions anything about our Defense Budget
-none
Apr 2015
#52
$118,000 FICA tax for millionaires and billionaires + corporations that don't pay any taxes.
YOHABLO
Apr 2015
#31