Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(13,090 posts)
25. I don't give a FF what Bill did. He's not running AFAIK. As for Hillary, you should back up what
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:42 PM
Apr 2015

you say if you wish to have any credibility, and not just being another worthless polemicist.

And by the way, I probably don't like Hillary any more than you do ( http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6520767 ). But around here "IIRC" blah blah doesn't convince anyone of anything.

12. IIRC, Clinton's also on record to raise the age and/or cut benefits to address the fully-fake crisis! crisis! in Social Security.


20. In 2008, Hillary was prattling on about the need to "reform" Social Security or some such crap, without raising taxes.


Oh, so you did some research after the "IIRC" in response #12 -- at least you got it down to a specific year. Maybe you can share the link. Though in #12 you were pretty specific in what you IIRC'd [font color = blue]"raise the age and/or cut benefits"[/font], while in #20, though you've got a specific year, suddenly the prescription is a bit more vague [font color = blue]"the need to 'reform' Social Security or some such crap, without raising taxes"[/font].

And whether it is a crisis or not, the projections are that Social Security will not be able to pay promised benefits after 2033 (18 years from now), and those projections have been trending to an earlier and earlier trust fund exhaustion date. Maybe you can tell us why that's not a problem.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Reced for exposire. n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2015 #1
Of course. Need money to fund tax cuts for the rich. Helen Borg Apr 2015 #2
and their wars SummerSnow Apr 2015 #26
Yes the Greedy 1% warrant46 Apr 2015 #42
Certainly. He won't need it, so why should he care about any one else? hamsterjill Apr 2015 #3
Newsflash jackass. The average Fox News viewer is around that age. onehandle Apr 2015 #4
fake news viewers are beyond logic Iliyah Apr 2015 #13
They won't touch anyone born before 1960 yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #21
and they will back him up 100%... SummerSnow Apr 2015 #27
Jeb Bush turbinetree Apr 2015 #5
Alternate Headline, "Prez Candidate Looking to Lose Home State" n/t itsrobert Apr 2015 #6
"No - Not Yet" Is The Answer Someone Not Ready For Prime Time Would Give DallasNE Apr 2015 #7
And we were told that Jeb is the smart one groundloop Apr 2015 #8
He clearly is the smarter Bush brother. Frank Cannon Apr 2015 #35
JEB... ELIMINATE THE FUCKING CAP AND SOCIAL SECURITY WILL BE FINE groundloop Apr 2015 #9
Marie Antoinette: "Let them eat cake." tabasco Apr 2015 #10
Well Put !! warrant46 Apr 2015 #43
A reality he does not get is this: dixiegrrrrl Apr 2015 #11
I Have a Friend RobinA Apr 2015 #49
When she reaches 65, she will be automatically switched over to reg. SS. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2015 #53
IIRC, Clinton's also on record to raise the age and/or cut benefits MannyGoldstein Apr 2015 #12
Which Clinton? I hadn't heard that one before. (wouldn't be surprised though) nm progree Apr 2015 #15
Both. Bill actually made a deal with Newt to starve grannies, MannyGoldstein Apr 2015 #20
I don't give a FF what Bill did. He's not running AFAIK. As for Hillary, you should back up what progree Apr 2015 #25
I found this article... christx30 Apr 2015 #37
There is already a sliding scale in place, adding time to when you can retire, with full benefits. SoapBox Apr 2015 #14
Yes. I think the so-called full retirement age maxes out at 67 for people born in 1960 and later progree Apr 2015 #16
I wish someone could conduct a study Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2015 #48
And experts are determining that since people Iliyah Apr 2015 #17
25 is for college people. If you are not in that group, you probably started working at 16 LiberalArkie Apr 2015 #18
Only the affluent are living longer. The trend among lower income people is negative. LongTomH Apr 2015 #34
I can't retire until I'm 67 now....my mom died at 68. ileus Apr 2015 #19
+1 area51 Apr 2015 #47
Seriously? chapdrum Apr 2015 #22
Ask yourself, "To what electorate is this statement intended to appeal?" lostnfound Apr 2015 #23
So his plan is to slash SS for young people, to divide & conquer. Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #24
How about raising the cap instead of trying to deny Social Security benefits to folks, hoping they still_one Apr 2015 #28
If they raised it to age 90, they could really save some money! Larry Engels Apr 2015 #29
Beware of Republicans saving something Tommy2Tone Apr 2015 #30
And of course no one that wants to "fix" Social Security, mentions anything about our Defense Budget -none Apr 2015 #52
$118,000 FICA tax for millionaires and billionaires + corporations that don't pay any taxes. YOHABLO Apr 2015 #31
Who the hell wants to work till they are 69? Klong Apr 2015 #32
Who the hell can work until they are 69? DallasNE Apr 2015 #38
"...the physical pounding is more than people past 62 can take." KansDem Apr 2015 #51
Just make it kacekwl Apr 2015 #33
That Will Really Go Over Well With Floridian's Corey_Baker08 Apr 2015 #36
The ones who already 'have it' often don't care... JCMach1 Apr 2015 #50
Old folks in walkers, delivering newspapers and waiting on tables daleo Apr 2015 #39
Here's another idea, Jeb-boy: have your fam pay back to the Treasury all your crony $/benefits....nt JudyM Apr 2015 #40
Buck Fush. N/t roamer65 Apr 2015 #41
People forget, but... davekriss Apr 2015 #44
GOP plan is raise the age until most are dead... freshwest Apr 2015 #45
I would back exile to a remote Pacific island for the entire bush* clan nolabels Apr 2015 #46
The less money Social Security pays out... bikebloke Apr 2015 #54
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeb Bush Backs Hike in So...»Reply #25