Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

alp227

(33,359 posts)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:29 PM Apr 2012

Bradley Manning judge warns military prosecutors in WikiLeaks case [View all]

Source: The Guardian

The military judge in the court-martial of the US soldier accused of handing WikiLeaks the biggest trove of unauthorised state secrets in American history has put army prosecutors on notice that they must prove Bradley Manning knew he was helping the enemy or face the possibility that the most serious charge against him be dismissed.

Colonel Denise Lind refused to throw out the charge – "aiding the enemy" – as had been requested by Manning's defence lawyers. But she told the military prosecution that during the trial, now scheduled for the end of September, that they would have to prove that the intelligence analyst was fully aware that he was helping the enemy when he allegedly handed hundreds of thousands of secret US documents to WikiLeaks.

Aiding the enemy is the most serious in the list of 22 charges that have been brought against Manning. It carries a maximum penalty of life in prison.

The trial will start on 21 September and is expected to last three weeks. It is certain to be closely followed in America and around the world, both by those who see Manning as a traitor to his country and military superiors, and by those who believe he was a hero who is being punished for being a whistleblower.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/apr/26/bradley-manning-judge-warns-prosecutors

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Manning should be given the goddamn medal of honor. Scuba Apr 2012 #1
Yup. Revealing crimes against humanity deserved no less. nt duhneece Apr 2012 #4
Medal of honor and...His motives show that if he did give information than axollot Apr 2012 #17
A medal for what? Has he confessed that he did anything? cstanleytech Apr 2012 #20
WTF; greiner3 Apr 2012 #23
I'll try to explain then. cstanleytech Apr 2012 #25
I don't think they can prove that. Manning will probably get a lesser charge. Alexander Apr 2012 #2
Time Served bahrbearian Apr 2012 #3
Not gonna happen... BadtotheboneBob Apr 2012 #11
No..the prosecution won't say he did it on a lark...it was his being a malcontent, and for revenge. msanthrope Apr 2012 #13
Frankly, he should get about 25, and serve about 16, Dishonorable Discharge, and be out in 12 Big_Mike Apr 2012 #19
And I want Bush and Cheney in prison for life but thats as likely to happen as those you listed are cstanleytech Apr 2012 #21
Yeah. Sad, but probably true Big_Mike Apr 2012 #26
True, heck I dream of hitting the powerball and moving to a dream estate overlooking a beach in cstanleytech Apr 2012 #27
F. Lee Bailey... iandhr Apr 2012 #5
Those Foaming at the Mouth Fascists Whould Be Prosecuted Instead Demeter Apr 2012 #6
That seems like common sense Canuckistanian Apr 2012 #7
I see it differently rtracey Apr 2012 #8
One of the complaints stemming from WWII avebury Apr 2012 #9
Actually at this time I think Burke has been proven wrong. cstanleytech Apr 2012 #22
I think treason is a stretch JonLP24 Apr 2012 #24
This is very bad news for the defense. Not a single charge thrown...and knowledge will be proven. msanthrope Apr 2012 #10
I don't think they can prove that. The bar might be lower than it seems, though. Poll_Blind Apr 2012 #12
Yeah--my post above indicates that Manning's statements would provide proof. The jury would decide msanthrope Apr 2012 #14
If Lamo is still coming across as being, for lack of a better term, "drugged" in interviews... Poll_Blind Apr 2012 #15
Actually, Lamo did a great job testifying at the Article 32. msanthrope Apr 2012 #16
i don't know jack about military law but it would seem arely staircase Apr 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bradley Manning judge war...