Latest Breaking News

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)

29. I can't think of another justice who incredibly rarely

Reply to LibertyLover (Reply #13)

Tue Apr 28, 2015, 02:29 PM

Apr 2015

Asks a question or a comment. I used incredibly on purpose even though wrong way to use.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

60 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justices Appear Deeply Divided on Right to Same-Sex Marriage [View all] Mira Apr 2015 OP

"groups of four people must be allowed to marry" PSPS Apr 2015 #1

Which question has nothing to do with the matter before the court, IMO. closeupready Apr 2015 #4

Well that would be Biblical, no? n2doc Apr 2015 #7

I was thinking the same thing Mira Apr 2015 #8

lol, here we see what these "justices" really think wordpix Apr 2015 #15

I must say I wouldn't have a problem if we did allow people to have >2-person marriages. Chan790 Apr 2015 #39

Like in the bible? truthisfreedom Apr 2015 #42

I don't even have any real ethical issues with polygamy anyway. NYC Liberal Apr 2015 #49

so alito is an idiot too samsingh Apr 2015 #2

But you've known that for a good, long while villager Apr 2015 #28

yes, i have samsingh Apr 2015 #36

How can they be called justicies heaven05 Apr 2015 #3

The word "troglodyte" didn't exist in 1789 jmowreader Apr 2015 #16

From this summary, sounds like alito and scalia have been drinking/smoking SOMETHING elleng Apr 2015 #5

Not sure about this specific case but I would think this is a no-brainer underpants Apr 2015 #10

Scalia especially which makes me think its time for him to step down and retire cstanleytech Apr 2015 #19

Exactly, was an extremely foolish thing for him to say, elleng Apr 2015 #40

And even then the law cannot interfere with their religion except under certain rare circumstances cstanleytech Apr 2015 #47

Yes. elleng Apr 2015 #48

Is the Catholic Church forced to marry Divorced couples, HockeyMom Apr 2015 #6

Scalia has been having alot of problems which leads me to believe cstanleytech Apr 2015 #21

Yes. That argument is moot, and it is embarrassing that US Supreme Court justices Zorra Apr 2015 #22

I've been wondering catrose Apr 2015 #46

Not unless the person gets an annulment marshall Apr 2015 #50

No wonder the Supreme Court of America is the only major national Court in the world to prohibit video. Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #9

What does video have to do with it? former9thward Apr 2015 #24

Which is also a great argument to not bother with actually watching movies or television, just listen to the audio!? Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #41

I would vote for Sanders as a protest vote. former9thward Apr 2015 #43

I love watching appeal court justices and lawyers in action.....nothing like TV law. Real people, real law, real issues. Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #44

Isn't constitutionality, if not the only, by far the major question for them to answer? BobTheSubgenius Apr 2015 #11

Tradition WTF Politicalboi Apr 2015 #12

And as usual Thomas sits and stinks, er, I mean LibertyLover Apr 2015 #13

I can't think of another justice who incredibly rarely yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #29

The sick irony is Thomas' marriage was as illegal in many states as same-sex marriages are today. NYC Liberal Apr 2015 #53

So very true LibertyLover Apr 2015 #56

Based on the questions and comments from the SC, especially those from Kennedy and Roberts, I would still_one Apr 2015 #14

Moving back in time? yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #31

The SC isn't, and I suspect the President was always for it, but for still_one Apr 2015 #35

A LOT of those 38 states only have it because of higher Jamastiene Apr 2015 #52

Question: Let's say conservatives win the rulling Reter Apr 2015 #57

I hope not but I really think the ruling will go our way yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #58

Regardless of the courts final decision, I think this argument will be *the* cornerstone debate... LanternWaste Apr 2015 #17

So much for the slam-dunk win that some have been predicting. Paladin Apr 2015 #18

The beatings will continue until morale improves. Got it. closeupready Apr 2015 #20

Oh goodness yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #32

From your keyboard to God's ears...... (nt) Paladin Apr 2015 #38

In favor or against? Jamastiene Apr 2015 #51

Sorry. In favor of gay marriage yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #55

I'm very nervous over this, indeed. June will take forever to get here... eom Purveyor Apr 2015 #23

Transcripts of SCOTUS marriage hearings 4/28/15: Zorra Apr 2015 #25

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #26

Hey Tony and Sam DonCoquixote Apr 2015 #27

They don't care about who the President is yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #33

Legally Weak Case HassleCat Apr 2015 #30

My Con Law is rusty, but shouldn't this be framed as an Equal Protection question? Myrina Apr 2015 #34

I think typically they argue a position from many different angles; closeupready Apr 2015 #37

And the wingnuts will be on the wrong side of history again. displacedtexan Apr 2015 #45

To me, that question that Alito asked is very unprofessional. Jamastiene Apr 2015 #54

"noble and sacred institution" Skittles Apr 2015 #59

All of that is irrelevant, the issue should the COURTS made this decision? happyslug Apr 2015 #60