Latest Breaking News

Laser102

(816 posts)

38. The honesty and pureness of the Clinton Foundation?

Mon May 4, 2015, 12:33 PM

May 2015

I'll take your sarcasm and point you to the people that have been helped. Clinton can lie about his personal life, but the good he does for millions is nothing to mock. Remember that!!!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

89 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bill Clinton: Foundation has done nothing wrong [View all] Omaha Steve May 2015 OP

Isn't that what some people want to happen here? leftofcool May 2015 #1

Ignore the optics if you wish. CanadaexPat May 2015 #2

Hillary Clinton will be the next POTUS leftofcool May 2015 #7

No doubt! truthisfreedom May 2015 #21

By November 15, 2016, we should know if that is true. merrily May 2015 #29

And six years later you will be whining about it. candelista May 2015 #52

"The optics." Not bad! :) Larry Engels May 2015 #78

it's what i want. mopinko May 2015 #5

its this type of crap that makes me nearly throw up thinking about the clintons. I am so tired roguevalley May 2015 #44

+1. nt candelista May 2015 #46

it's Groundhog Day Angel Martin May 2015 #69

or maybe it should be Angel Martin May 2015 #70

The Clinton Global Foundation isn't running for President. Scuba May 2015 #3

Well, Try Gowdy can't find anything, Obama says she did not. leftofcool May 2015 #8

That does not refute the allegation. candelista May 2015 #47

Are you talking about the Canadian deal. Sure it has already gone down in flames. Thinkingabout May 2015 #66

I trust the New Yorker and the New York times before I trust you, Ann candelista May 2015 #67

Here's a follow up replying to your specific non-justification. candelista May 2015 #68

The years you list in the article was not during the time Hillary was SOS. Thinkingabout May 2015 #71

You are completely wrong. candelista May 2015 #72

Read the link you furnished it was before Hillary was SOS. She did not become SOS until 2009. Thinkingabout May 2015 #74

Your post reminds me of your candidate: tricky and deceptive. Larry Engels May 2015 #77

The deception is on the ones misquoting the facts. Conspiracy theories do not make Thinkingabout May 2015 #79

The question is Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #15

No, you're mistaken. OnyxCollie May 2015 #31

I hope lots of people read your post. candelista May 2015 #57

I cannot believe Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #59

"Accusing"? "No evidence"? candelista May 2015 #61

Bs Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #63

Just the sort of non-answer I expected. candelista May 2015 #64

Not surprising is it? They have no answers. Just non-answers. Larry Engels May 2015 #76

The evidence is in the secret State Department cables OnyxCollie May 2015 #65

Calling it "right wing" does not refute it. candelista May 2015 #48

Too early to tell JonLP24 May 2015 #19

Every time I turn around, there is another example of suspicious financial conduct. candelista May 2015 #49

Alert. truthisfreedom May 2015 #22

How'd that work out? Scuba May 2015 #41

You alerted for a factually correct claim? candelista May 2015 #50

I don't think that is the question- or at any rate it's not the only question cali May 2015 #35

Access To Power HassleCat May 2015 #4

Good post. Especially succinct headline. nt candelista May 2015 #62

As you were typing this I heard the author of the book on our local right wing radio station. postulater May 2015 #6

So were his fees tripled or not? candelista May 2015 #51

The name sounds like a PAC SCVDem May 2015 #9

It has been defined repeatedly & they are very open giftedgirl77 May 2015 #12

I made a simple observation. SCVDem May 2015 #26

Its still suspicious Amishman May 2015 #33

Hugely so. candelista May 2015 #53

Tearing down the Clinton Foundation is desparate BS Gman May 2015 #10

I don't ever want to accept donations from the King of Saudi Arabia JonLP24 May 2015 #16

Why not? I'd take their money all day, every day, if it meant helping people TekGryphon May 2015 #20

How did they make the money though? JonLP24 May 2015 #24

In fact there are a few facts known now that weren't known in 2008 tularetom May 2015 #11

You're accepting donations from the wrong kind of people JonLP24 May 2015 #13

They don't have to go to Africa or India to find poverty and despair, we need to fix our country whereisjustice May 2015 #14

Wow that is some twisted logic! Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #18

$300,000+ a speech buys a lot of foreign influence doesn't it? Yes, I believe it does. whereisjustice May 2015 #81

This is amazing that people are fixated on that RE meme Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #82

$300,000+ a speech for someone who claims to know what's hurting the middle class whereisjustice May 2015 #85

Okee dokee Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #87

I made a mistake $300,000 is discount rate, but Wall Street can get two speeches for $500,000 whereisjustice May 2015 #88

an odd blend of inaccuracies, xenophobia, and incoherence nt geek tragedy May 2015 #43

I agree it is an inconvenient truth in the eyes of a Wall Street Democrat. Hillary and Bill, saving whereisjustice May 2015 #83

Agreed. I have said from the start that this is an international foundation and would naturally jwirr May 2015 #17

And naturally fail to report them as well? merrily May 2015 #30

Yes, that may be a real problem. I was referring to them taking money from international sources. jwirr May 2015 #39

I guess that depends on your definition of "wrong," Mr Clinton. malthaussen May 2015 #23

Um, no. File under "Appearance of Impropriety". closeupready May 2015 #25

Good point. "Appearance of impropriety" is a standard that comes about because merrily May 2015 #28

Exactly, and I'm old enough to remember a time when closeupready May 2015 #34

I am not saying the Foundation did something wrong or that it did not. merrily May 2015 #27

Bill Clinton should just stop the Clinton Foundation!!!! Laser102 May 2015 #32

See? It's all ok! Bill wouldn't lie about anything, now would he? :) candelista May 2015 #36

The honesty and pureness of the Clinton Foundation? Laser102 May 2015 #38

Bernie Madoff made lots of charitable contributions, too. candelista May 2015 #45

Too bad some DUers have hitched their wagon to the right wing Kingofalldems May 2015 #37

Criticism of the Clintons is by definition "right wing"? candelista May 2015 #55

Never said or posted that. You just made it up. Kingofalldems May 2015 #73

That is disingenuous. Larry Engels May 2015 #75

I said some DUers and certainly not the OP Kingofalldems May 2015 #80

Sorry, but you seem to me to be splitting hairs. Sgt Preston May 2015 #86

I like all Democrats. They are way better than republicans. Kingofalldems May 2015 #89

The Clinton Foundation has done a lot of good, particularly in Africa. Beacool May 2015 #40

Thank You! Well said. Laser102 May 2015 #42

It's about The. People's. Issues fredamae May 2015 #54

What Else Would One Expect Him To Say cantbeserious May 2015 #56

He could say.... candelista May 2015 #58

Not For Me - I'm Not Ready For Oligarchy - HRC Style cantbeserious May 2015 #60

Tony Rodham is hyper-qualified to run a Hatian gold mine ... quadrature May 2015 #84