Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)

2. Fear the future?

Reply to onehandle (Reply #1)

Mon May 4, 2015, 10:40 PM

May 2015

Very few states are passing gun control laws, more states are loosening their gun laws.
UBC's are a good thing, most gun owners have no problem with it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Oregon bill passes expanding background checks for gun sales [View all] Omaha Steve May 2015 OP

Fear the future, gun nuts. nt onehandle May 2015 #1

Fear the future? GGJohn May 2015 #2

strange, what upsets them and what does not Skittles May 2015 #3

As a gun owner, I have no problem with expanded background checks GGJohn May 2015 #6

there is a difference between gun owners and gun humpers Skittles May 2015 #8

You'll get no arguement out of me on that. eom. GGJohn May 2015 #9

why are you responding as if you are the people referred to by that post? CreekDog May 2015 #14

To some here, any gun owner is a gun nut hack89 May 2015 #18

Why do you care if I'm responding? GGJohn May 2015 #22

actually, they cannot fear more than they already do Skittles May 2015 #4

Most "gun nuts" like universal background checks Recursion May 2015 #5

actualy responsible gun owners like ubcs. gun nuts do not. samsingh May 2015 #11

not here they don't CreekDog May 2015 #15

Yet you have several gudgeon regulars in this thread supporting UBCs. hack89 May 2015 #19

So why don't you post that thread? eom. GGJohn May 2015 #23

Unless it requires a gun owner to sell/transfer a gun through an FFL to ensure a background check Hoyt May 2015 #26

Why? I'm pro second amendment and I support laws like these. Throd May 2015 #27

Good for Oregon. It's an intelligent, conscientious, responsible, sane decision. n/t Judi Lynn May 2015 #7

One of the very few times I agree with you. eom. GGJohn May 2015 #10

Hopefully Oregon is getting a better law than ManiacJoe May 2015 #12

One day, in Hillary Clinton's second term.. cosmicone May 2015 #13

That turbinetree May 2015 #16

It would make no difference hack89 May 2015 #21

I disagree turbinetree May 2015 #24

I said the 2A as presently interpreted allows strict regulation of guns hack89 May 2015 #25

The 2A does not prevent strict regulation of guns. hack89 May 2015 #20

Good law. My state has had them for years with no issues. nt hack89 May 2015 #17