Latest Breaking News

Larry Engels

(387 posts)

76. Not surprising is it? They have no answers. Just non-answers.

Reply to candelista (Reply #64)

Mon May 4, 2015, 11:45 PM

May 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

89 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bill Clinton: Foundation has done nothing wrong [View all] Omaha Steve May 2015 OP

Isn't that what some people want to happen here? leftofcool May 2015 #1

Ignore the optics if you wish. CanadaexPat May 2015 #2

Hillary Clinton will be the next POTUS leftofcool May 2015 #7

No doubt! truthisfreedom May 2015 #21

By November 15, 2016, we should know if that is true. merrily May 2015 #29

And six years later you will be whining about it. candelista May 2015 #52

"The optics." Not bad! :) Larry Engels May 2015 #78

it's what i want. mopinko May 2015 #5

its this type of crap that makes me nearly throw up thinking about the clintons. I am so tired roguevalley May 2015 #44

+1. nt candelista May 2015 #46

it's Groundhog Day Angel Martin May 2015 #69

or maybe it should be Angel Martin May 2015 #70

The Clinton Global Foundation isn't running for President. Scuba May 2015 #3

Well, Try Gowdy can't find anything, Obama says she did not. leftofcool May 2015 #8

That does not refute the allegation. candelista May 2015 #47

Are you talking about the Canadian deal. Sure it has already gone down in flames. Thinkingabout May 2015 #66

I trust the New Yorker and the New York times before I trust you, Ann candelista May 2015 #67

Here's a follow up replying to your specific non-justification. candelista May 2015 #68

The years you list in the article was not during the time Hillary was SOS. Thinkingabout May 2015 #71

You are completely wrong. candelista May 2015 #72

Read the link you furnished it was before Hillary was SOS. She did not become SOS until 2009. Thinkingabout May 2015 #74

Your post reminds me of your candidate: tricky and deceptive. Larry Engels May 2015 #77

The deception is on the ones misquoting the facts. Conspiracy theories do not make Thinkingabout May 2015 #79

The question is Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #15

No, you're mistaken. OnyxCollie May 2015 #31

I hope lots of people read your post. candelista May 2015 #57

I cannot believe Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #59

"Accusing"? "No evidence"? candelista May 2015 #61

Bs Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #63

Just the sort of non-answer I expected. candelista May 2015 #64

Not surprising is it? They have no answers. Just non-answers. Larry Engels May 2015 #76

The evidence is in the secret State Department cables OnyxCollie May 2015 #65

Calling it "right wing" does not refute it. candelista May 2015 #48

Too early to tell JonLP24 May 2015 #19

Every time I turn around, there is another example of suspicious financial conduct. candelista May 2015 #49

Alert. truthisfreedom May 2015 #22

How'd that work out? Scuba May 2015 #41

You alerted for a factually correct claim? candelista May 2015 #50

I don't think that is the question- or at any rate it's not the only question cali May 2015 #35

Access To Power HassleCat May 2015 #4

Good post. Especially succinct headline. nt candelista May 2015 #62

As you were typing this I heard the author of the book on our local right wing radio station. postulater May 2015 #6

So were his fees tripled or not? candelista May 2015 #51

The name sounds like a PAC SCVDem May 2015 #9

It has been defined repeatedly & they are very open giftedgirl77 May 2015 #12

I made a simple observation. SCVDem May 2015 #26

Its still suspicious Amishman May 2015 #33

Hugely so. candelista May 2015 #53

Tearing down the Clinton Foundation is desparate BS Gman May 2015 #10

I don't ever want to accept donations from the King of Saudi Arabia JonLP24 May 2015 #16

Why not? I'd take their money all day, every day, if it meant helping people TekGryphon May 2015 #20

How did they make the money though? JonLP24 May 2015 #24

In fact there are a few facts known now that weren't known in 2008 tularetom May 2015 #11

You're accepting donations from the wrong kind of people JonLP24 May 2015 #13

They don't have to go to Africa or India to find poverty and despair, we need to fix our country whereisjustice May 2015 #14

Wow that is some twisted logic! Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #18

$300,000+ a speech buys a lot of foreign influence doesn't it? Yes, I believe it does. whereisjustice May 2015 #81

This is amazing that people are fixated on that RE meme Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #82

$300,000+ a speech for someone who claims to know what's hurting the middle class whereisjustice May 2015 #85

Okee dokee Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #87

I made a mistake $300,000 is discount rate, but Wall Street can get two speeches for $500,000 whereisjustice May 2015 #88

an odd blend of inaccuracies, xenophobia, and incoherence nt geek tragedy May 2015 #43

I agree it is an inconvenient truth in the eyes of a Wall Street Democrat. Hillary and Bill, saving whereisjustice May 2015 #83

Agreed. I have said from the start that this is an international foundation and would naturally jwirr May 2015 #17

And naturally fail to report them as well? merrily May 2015 #30

Yes, that may be a real problem. I was referring to them taking money from international sources. jwirr May 2015 #39

I guess that depends on your definition of "wrong," Mr Clinton. malthaussen May 2015 #23

Um, no. File under "Appearance of Impropriety". closeupready May 2015 #25

Good point. "Appearance of impropriety" is a standard that comes about because merrily May 2015 #28

Exactly, and I'm old enough to remember a time when closeupready May 2015 #34

I am not saying the Foundation did something wrong or that it did not. merrily May 2015 #27

Bill Clinton should just stop the Clinton Foundation!!!! Laser102 May 2015 #32

See? It's all ok! Bill wouldn't lie about anything, now would he? :) candelista May 2015 #36

The honesty and pureness of the Clinton Foundation? Laser102 May 2015 #38

Bernie Madoff made lots of charitable contributions, too. candelista May 2015 #45

Too bad some DUers have hitched their wagon to the right wing Kingofalldems May 2015 #37

Criticism of the Clintons is by definition "right wing"? candelista May 2015 #55

Never said or posted that. You just made it up. Kingofalldems May 2015 #73

That is disingenuous. Larry Engels May 2015 #75

I said some DUers and certainly not the OP Kingofalldems May 2015 #80

Sorry, but you seem to me to be splitting hairs. Sgt Preston May 2015 #86

I like all Democrats. They are way better than republicans. Kingofalldems May 2015 #89

The Clinton Foundation has done a lot of good, particularly in Africa. Beacool May 2015 #40

Thank You! Well said. Laser102 May 2015 #42

It's about The. People's. Issues fredamae May 2015 #54

What Else Would One Expect Him To Say cantbeserious May 2015 #56

He could say.... candelista May 2015 #58

Not For Me - I'm Not Ready For Oligarchy - HRC Style cantbeserious May 2015 #60

Tony Rodham is hyper-qualified to run a Hatian gold mine ... quadrature May 2015 #84