Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Demeter

(85,373 posts)

17. I regret that I have only one Rec. to give to this Constitutional Issue!

Reply to IDemo (Original post)

Thu May 7, 2015, 12:21 PM

May 2015

It deserves a billion or more.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal Appeals Court Says NSA Phone Records Program Illegal [View all] IDemo May 2015 OP

;''the program was not allowed in the first place. '' Ichingcarpenter May 2015 #1

Snowdenite Jesus Malverde May 2015 #5

How are they going to rationalize Snowden's charges under the Espionage Act now? riderinthestorm May 2015 #25

Now - what will they do with this Data Center asiliveandbreathe May 2015 #2

The only logical, responsible thing. christx30 May 2015 #3

All of the phone data in the US isn't that big. jeff47 May 2015 #12

It is when they record everything. PSPS May 2015 #29

No, it really isn't. jeff47 May 2015 #32

This court has little idea what the NSA is up to. Jesus Malverde May 2015 #4

This president has little idea what the NSA is up to. Ichingcarpenter May 2015 #6

Yep Jesus Malverde May 2015 #7

Finally a Judge who knows the law dickthegrouch May 2015 #8

I would add that all 3 judges agreed Not water May 2015 #18

An interesting take by a political science professor at Tufts. jalan48 May 2015 #9

+1 Enthusiast May 2015 #22

+1 nt riderinthestorm May 2015 #24

absolutely grasswire May 2015 #26

Ever been to a business meeting that dragged on too long? IDemo May 2015 #10

K&R CharlotteVale May 2015 #11

This is a bad result in one way. jeff47 May 2015 #13

The 1979 case was about one guy who committed a crime Not water May 2015 #15

Doesn't matter. jeff47 May 2015 #16

It matters a lot Not water May 2015 #19

Except the ruling did not require the person to be suspected of a crime. jeff47 May 2015 #20

The ruling required suspicion Not water May 2015 #23

Not the part I am talking about. jeff47 May 2015 #28

The relevancy they will claim is that they are monitoring for terrorists forming hidden networks cstanleytech May 2015 #21

In 1979, these records were kept by the Bell System. PSPS May 2015 #30

Sure, except for the fact that it actually happened in 1979 jeff47 May 2015 #33

Flashback: Bob Cesca slams Glenn Greenwald, calls phone dragnet 'legal' Not water May 2015 #14

Bob Cesca is a nobody, a shill. grasswire May 2015 #27

Yes, and I go to Playboy Bunnies for expert medical advice. PSPS May 2015 #31

I regret that I have only one Rec. to give to this Constitutional Issue! Demeter May 2015 #17