Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
34. These are 50-50 matching grants
Tue May 19, 2015, 01:54 AM
May 2015

If someone is on TANF Transitional Aid for Needy Families the federal Government will match any state grant up to the "Standard of Need" set by Congress. The Standard of Need is $741 a month. Thus if the state sets it's welfare grant at $741 a month the federal government will 1/2 of that amount but the state must pay the other half.

If the state Decides to pay less the feds will just pay half of what the state pays. In my home state the amount set for one person on welfare is $174 month. The feds pay $87.50 the state pays $87 50. If the state would set the welfare grant at $741 a month, the feds will pay $ 370.50 and the state will have to pay $ 370.50; total of $741.00.

No state has ever paid the Standard of need. The Standard of Need was set in 1967 as the minimal one needs to survive. The Standard of Need is adjusted for inflation each year but the state's are not required to adjust their welfare grants. My home state of Pennsylvania has not adjusted its welfare grants since 1982.

Thus the state's set the grant amount but gets half of that amount from the feds.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Different from premeditated murder how? randys1 May 2015 #1
I won't say premeditated murder, yeoman6987 May 2015 #2
The voters there do want this warrant46 May 2015 #35
Migration of the poor... the_sly_pig May 2015 #3
Just more John Birchers. Wellstone ruled May 2015 #5
That's the plan apparently. nt valerief May 2015 #8
Maybe they need the money to pay for Sheriff Joe Apraio's mpcamb May 2015 #21
Yep, self deportation of their needy citizens to Dem states stuffmatters May 2015 #18
I do not have words to say how angry this makes me. Do they have jobs in their state for all these jwirr May 2015 #4
A lot of them are probably employed. hollowdweller May 2015 #11
I know. For low wages. jwirr May 2015 #23
Yeah I was just wondering how it is that a State can cut someone off of a Federal Program... Volaris May 2015 #24
Unfortunately federal programs such as Medicaid and also cash assistance are administered by the jwirr May 2015 #25
The plan Roy Rolling May 2015 #6
+1 daleanime May 2015 #12
I admire your succinct approach Rolando May 2015 #32
Amazing turbinetree May 2015 #7
"A decent provision for the poor is the true test of a civilization." etherealtruth May 2015 #9
That sucks! Enthusiast May 2015 #10
Selling drugs and stealing will fill the gap hollowdweller May 2015 #13
not just starve, welfare pays rent. They will be homeless and the state will take the kids away. Sunlei May 2015 #14
K & R MoreGOPoop May 2015 #15
Wow, those tax cuts for rich people have paid for themselves, haven't they? perdita9 May 2015 #16
'will drop at least 1600 families from the state's FEDERALLY FUNDED welfare program' groundloop May 2015 #17
These are 50-50 matching grants happyslug May 2015 #34
These here Thespian2 May 2015 #19
This just makes me so angry TerrapinFlyer May 2015 #20
Come to Arizona Rolando May 2015 #27
I feel ya Pakhet May 2015 #33
. . . CountAllVotes May 2015 #22
A disgrace AuntPatsy May 2015 #26
Its so simply isn't it? Just pull what little they have out from under them Stargazer99 May 2015 #28
I agree with your sentiment, but Rolando May 2015 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author Stargazer99 May 2015 #29
A deficit? Have they tried cutting taxes more? jberryhill May 2015 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Facing $1 billion deficit...»Reply #34