Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Judi Lynn

(164,137 posts)
Thu May 28, 2015, 05:21 PM May 2015

Judge’s ruling allows concealed-carry for D.C. gun owners, shoots down police objections [View all]

Source: Washington Times

Judge’s ruling allows concealed-carry for D.C. gun owners, shoots down police objections

By Andrea Noble - The Washington Times - Thursday, May 28, 2015



A federal judge on Thursday denied a short-term stay on a decision that blocked the District from enforcing a key provision of its restrictive concealed-carry laws — prompting the city to notify gun owners who had been denied a carry permit that they now can obtain one.

U.S. District Judge Frederick J. Scullin Jr. left open the possibility the District could obtain a stay pending appeal of his previous ruling, which called the city’s requirement that gun owners demonstrate a “good reason” to obtain a permit unconstitutional. He set a hearing on the matter for July 7.

In the meantime, the ruling means the Metropolitan Police Department may end up issuing concealed carry permits to applicants who previously had been denied because they could not demonstrate they face a specific threat of injury or harm.

The gun owners who brought the case against the city received phone calls from MPD on Thursday advising them to come to the department’s Firearms Registration Section for approval of their concealed carry permits, said Alan Gottlieb, vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation, which backed the lawsuit.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/28/judges-ruling-allows-concealed-carry-for-dc-gun-ow/



(Sorry for the source, it's the only news service with this information I could find, unfortunately.)
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gun Nuts Rights > People's Rights Not To Be Terrorized nt onehandle May 2015 #1
More accurately... sarisataka May 2015 #2
you nailed the salient point n/t Psephos May 2015 #3
Because who would want to live without fear... daleanime Jun 2015 #7
I seem to have missed the part in the Constitution about "fear of others doing things I don't like" friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #10
Why? daleanime Jun 2015 #11
"I've given up on any hope for improvement" 'Improvement'? Fewer people are being killed with guns friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #13
What fear? nt sarisataka Jun 2015 #12
Fear of people doing things *they* don't like. Puritanism is alive and well in gun control circles friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #15
Ah, "DU gun control advocacy" - largely insults, emotional arguments, and genitalia jokes friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #9
Washington Post on May 18: alp227 May 2015 #4
Great skamaria May 2015 #5
Gee, I don't know, why don't you tell us what could possibly go wrong? GGJohn May 2015 #6
plenty of people have no clue what could go wrong Skittles Jun 2015 #16
You lot cry wolf whenever some place goes 'shall-issue', and have done so since at least 2007 friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #17
I mean, DC's 30 year gun ban worked so well, you know? (nt) Recursion Jun 2015 #19
The police have a sad because they cannot deny another civil liberty. hack89 Jun 2015 #8
A few posters here are having the same sad... friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #14
If a 'good reason' requirement is unconstitutional, it sounds as though the judge is petronius Jun 2015 #18
More than just two circuits.... S_B_Jackson Jun 2015 #20
Make the title: DC cops push for unconstitutional laws Taitertots Jun 2015 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge’s ruling allows con...