Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(33,295 posts)
4. Washington Post on May 18:
Thu May 28, 2015, 06:27 PM
May 2015
Federal judge again rules key part of new D.C. gun law unconstitutional

Ten months after striking down the District’s long-standing ban on carrying firearms in public as unconstitutional, a federal judge Monday ordered the city to halt enforcing a key provision of the new gun-permitting system it adapted in response.

As passed by the D.C. Council, the District’s new carry legislation remains among the strictest in the nation, requiring applicants to state good reason to carry a weapon in order to obtain a permit from police, matching laws in Maryland, New Jersey and New York.

However, in a 23-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Frederick J. Scullin Jr. ruled that condition — known as the “good reason/proper reason” requirement — still “impinges on Plaintiffs’ Second Amendment right to bear arms,” because it fails to target dangerous people or specifically how or where individuals carry weapons.


Scullin is a GHW Bush nominee to his bench.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Gun Nuts Rights > People's Rights Not To Be Terrorized nt onehandle May 2015 #1
More accurately... sarisataka May 2015 #2
you nailed the salient point n/t Psephos May 2015 #3
Because who would want to live without fear... daleanime Jun 2015 #7
I seem to have missed the part in the Constitution about "fear of others doing things I don't like" friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #10
Why? daleanime Jun 2015 #11
"I've given up on any hope for improvement" 'Improvement'? Fewer people are being killed with guns friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #13
What fear? nt sarisataka Jun 2015 #12
Fear of people doing things *they* don't like. Puritanism is alive and well in gun control circles friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #15
Ah, "DU gun control advocacy" - largely insults, emotional arguments, and genitalia jokes friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #9
Washington Post on May 18: alp227 May 2015 #4
Great skamaria May 2015 #5
Gee, I don't know, why don't you tell us what could possibly go wrong? GGJohn May 2015 #6
plenty of people have no clue what could go wrong Skittles Jun 2015 #16
You lot cry wolf whenever some place goes 'shall-issue', and have done so since at least 2007 friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #17
I mean, DC's 30 year gun ban worked so well, you know? (nt) Recursion Jun 2015 #19
The police have a sad because they cannot deny another civil liberty. hack89 Jun 2015 #8
A few posters here are having the same sad... friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #14
If a 'good reason' requirement is unconstitutional, it sounds as though the judge is petronius Jun 2015 #18
More than just two circuits.... S_B_Jackson Jun 2015 #20
Make the title: DC cops push for unconstitutional laws Taitertots Jun 2015 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge’s ruling allows con...»Reply #4