Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,872 posts)
10. no, he is looking for a deal that works with executive orders
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 04:48 PM
Jun 2015

Or has a way to make doing so attractive to businesses.

Consider that the Senate failed to pass anything in 2010 when we had 59 Senators. Part of the problem is there were many coal state Democrats unwilling to vote for it. There were about 5 Republicans who were interested, though there never was a vote.

Here, I suspect that his opinion has been formed partly from speaking to Kerry. Note that Kerry was key on the deal with China, which does not need Congressional approval and has some real gains.

It is sad, but it is reality.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the line - "we know the politics in the US. Whether we like it or not, if it comes to the Congress, NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #1
yes, indeed! n/t MBS Jun 2015 #20
Sad. Loryn Jun 2015 #23
Everyone knows this but our own brainwashed citizens Elmer S. E. Dump Jun 2015 #35
The world disparages our congress yet we still keep electing the same bozos Auggie Jun 2015 #2
Congress is like the rich crazy alcoholic aunt who keeps getting invited to family events... TygrBright Jun 2015 #3
Embarrassing, isn't it? arcane1 Jun 2015 #4
" " " " n/t MBS Jun 2015 #21
Exactly what I was going to say. n/t cui bono Jun 2015 #26
It was only a matter of time Ahpook Jun 2015 #5
So if i'm reading this right, what he's looking for is a largely unenforcable agreement. n/t hughee99 Jun 2015 #6
More optimistically, he's looking to explore the scope of executive orders. Jim Lane Jun 2015 #7
no, he is looking for a deal that works with executive orders karynnj Jun 2015 #10
Deals based on executive orders can easily disappear in 2017. hughee99 Jun 2015 #12
true, but there is no way to pass anything. karynnj Jun 2015 #14
It's a bigger deal to reverse something than it is to stop it. Gore1FL Jun 2015 #17
It depends on what the EO is. hughee99 Jun 2015 #24
technically unenforceable, but the issue then becomes geek tragedy Jun 2015 #11
They have the indebted ones so pegged, it's not funny. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2015 #8
Wise ananda Jun 2015 #9
"Whether we like it or not, if it comes to the Congress, they will refuse.” pampango Jun 2015 #13
Enough with the euphemisms! It's not "Congress," it's REPUBLICANS who are blocking every useful law. SunSeeker Jun 2015 #15
+ 1000 n/t MBS Jun 2015 #22
Enough with the excuses! It *is* "Congress": the *elected* House of Representatives. Own it. Nihil Jun 2015 #28
Spare me the "D is same as R" bullshit. That is the fucking lie that got us here. SunSeeker Jun 2015 #30
Rubbish. Nihil Jun 2015 #33
Nope. Even conservative Dems believe in science. SunSeeker Jun 2015 #34
This climate deal will be turned into a 'New World Order' conspiracy theory by the right...... LongTomH Jun 2015 #16
Not a smart thing for a French politician to say publically goldent Jun 2015 #18
Tie it to a trade agreement so it gets fast tracked up and down The Second Stone Jun 2015 #19
"The Foreigners have taken over the world!" GReedDiamond Jun 2015 #25
That would be a great Tea Party slogan. Add in: "So we need to build a higher wall to keep THEM out" pampango Jun 2015 #29
Yup!...nt GReedDiamond Jun 2015 #32
better idea ...do not include the US ...............nt quadrature Jun 2015 #27
The rest of the world knows our Congress better than Americans.. mountain grammy Jun 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Climate deal must avoid U...»Reply #10