Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)

24. No, there isn't really dramatic warming if you start the trend in 1997 or 1999.

Reply to tclambert (Reply #10)

Fri Jun 5, 2015, 10:12 AM

Jun 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Global warming 'hiatus' never happened, NOAA scientists say [View all] n2doc Jun 2015 OP

not an illusion. Wishful propaganda to cover up an inconvenient truth. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #1

K & R SunSeeker Jun 2015 #2

This is one of the best layman's explanation I have seen DirtyHippyBastard Jun 2015 #3

Excellent! Thank you! Peace Patriot Jun 2015 #9

Recommended! Bill USA Jun 2015 #4

kick, kick, kick.... daleanime Jun 2015 #5

A few more links and details here: Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #6

You mean the Koch Kingpins lied to us again? Jack Rabbit Jun 2015 #7

Well, when you change the data, you change the outcome. 7962 Jun 2015 #8

'Watts Up With That" are liars and frauds, funded by fossil fuel. If they don't like this, it's good muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #16

Doesnt matter who funds them,their point is still valid. 7962 Jun 2015 #17

You've fallen for their bullshit muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #19

Yes, using more buoy. The RIGHT ones too. 7962 Jun 2015 #21

Rubbish - the USA is still the world's 2nd largest CO2 emitter muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #22

The earth doesnt care about "per capita" 7962 Jun 2015 #33

The earth doesn't care about national boundaries either muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #34

My friend in CAL just installed a solar system. Palm Springs. 7962 Jun 2015 #37

Actually it does matter who funds them. yellowcanine Jun 2015 #30

I am so sick of that "since 1998" meme. That's just bad trend analysis. tclambert Jun 2015 #10

And yet that's what was done. Igel Jun 2015 #11

a very intelligent post n/t Psephos Jun 2015 #13

You are coming up with lots of innuendo and no facts muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #15

No, there isn't really dramatic warming if you start the trend in 1997 or 1999. DesMoinesDem Jun 2015 #24

Yes, there is. tclambert Jun 2015 #25

No, you're still wrong. Even when using the GISTEMP dataset that your graph uses DesMoinesDem Jun 2015 #29

You start your bogus trend lines at .5 and go up to .6, which IS a dramatic increase. tclambert Jun 2015 #31

Holy shit this is funny. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. DesMoinesDem Jun 2015 #32

If you have a data set of fluctuating values, straight lines ARE bad trend analysis. tclambert Jun 2015 #39

Stop embarrassing yourself. You're complaining about linear trend lines...like the one in the OP. DesMoinesDem Jun 2015 #41

BLS has been doing the same thing with employment statistics. Psephos Jun 2015 #12

it all depends on where you live Baclava Jun 2015 #14

Good comparison. nt 7962 Jun 2015 #18

Interesting to see the deniers here on DU n/t n2doc Jun 2015 #20

You must be using the Chinese meaning for "interesting" GliderGuider Jun 2015 #26

Well I don't want to get banned n/t n2doc Jun 2015 #27

Mind-boggling actually... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #28

Clearly the GOP doesn't have the market FULLY cornered on scientific illiteracy yet NickB79 Jun 2015 #36

Pity Red1 Jun 2015 #23

Conservative reaction: sofa king Jun 2015 #35

Some conservatives believe that the line must be totally linear complendio Jun 2015 #38

Since climate is chaotic, change is a constant factor Big_Mike Jun 2015 #40