Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
10. I've been reading about the one drop rule recently, reminds me of something else in history
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 11:43 AM
Jun 2015
Who is black ? One nations definition
The One-Drop Rule Defined

To be considered black in the United States not even half of one's ancestry must be African black. But will one-fourth do, or one-eighth, or less? The nation's answer to the question 'Who is black?" has long been that a black is any person with any known African black ancestry. This definition reflects the long experience with slavery and later with Jim Crow segregation. In the South it became known as the "one-drop rule,'' meaning that a single drop of "black blood" makes a person a black. It is also known as the "one black ancestor rule," some courts have called it the "traceable amount rule," and anthropologists call it the "hypo-descent rule," meaning that racially mixed persons are assigned the status of the subordinate group. This definition emerged from the American South to become the nation's definition, generally accepted by whites and blacks. Blacks had no other choice. As we shall see, this American cultural definition of blacks is taken for granted as readily by judges, affirmative action officers, and black protesters as it is by Ku Klux Klansmen.

Let us not he confused by terminology. At present the usual statement of the one-drop rule is in terms of "black blood" or black ancestry, while not so long ago it referred to "Negro blood" or ancestry. The term "black" rapidly replaced "Negro" in general usage in the United States as the black power movement peaked at the end of the 1960s, but the black and Negro populations are the same. The term "black" is used in this book for persons with any black African lineage, not just for unmixed members of populations from sub-Saharan Africa. The term "Negro," which is used in certain historical contexts, means the same thing. Terms such as "African black," "unmixed Negro," and "all black" are used here to refer to unmixed blacks descended from African populations.

...


Uniqueness Of The One-Drop Rule

Not only does the one-drop rule apply to no other group than American blacks, but apparently the rule is unique in that it is found only in the United States and not in any other nation in the world. In fact, definitions of who is black vary quite sharply from country to country, and for this reason people in other countries often express consternation about our definition. James Baldwin relates a revealing incident that occurred in 1956 at the Conference of Negro-African Writers and Artists held in Paris. The head of the delegation of writers and artists from the United States was John Davis. The French chairperson introduced Davis and then asked him why he considered himself Negro, since he certainly did not look like one. Baldwin wrote, "He is a Negro, of course, from the remarkable legal point of view which obtains in the United States, but more importantly, as he tried to make clear to his interlocutor, he was a Negro by choice and by depth of involvement--by experience, in fact."

The phenomenon known as "passing as white" is difficult to explain in other countries or to foreign students. Typical questions are: "Shouldn't Americans say that a person who is passing as white is white, or nearly all white, and has previously been passing as black?" or "To be consistent, shouldn't you say that someone who is one-eighth white is passing as black?" or "Why is there so much concern, since the so-called blacks who pass take so little negroid ancestry with them?" Those who ask such questions need to realize that "passing" is much more a social phenomenon than a biological one, reflecting the nation's unique definition of what makes a person black. The concept of "passing" rests on the one-drop rule and on folk beliefs about race and miscegenation, not on biological or historical fact.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jefferson/mixed/onedrop.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Or NOT lark Jun 2015 #1
Why is this a national news story? Chakab Jun 2015 #2
wonder the same myself but I do know she's unstable wordpix Jun 2015 #5
Their Thanksgiving dinners..... wolfie001 Jun 2015 #27
Yeah, she seems like she needs help Warpy Jun 2015 #51
Even the black commentators on MSNBC were asking this question. jwirr Jun 2015 #26
Because the Fake Outrage Machine demands human flesh Sen. Walter Sobchak Jun 2015 #46
My family still talks about the India Guru in the family.... happyslug Jun 2015 #55
Because crazy and delusional sells. nt Nay Jun 2015 #52
because bigots think her fraud can be complared to the experience of transgender folk Skittles Jun 2015 #56
She's crazy Renew Deal Jun 2015 #3
may be unstable but trans people aren't crazy if they identify as opposite gender wordpix Jun 2015 #33
Science derby378 Jun 2015 #40
exactly catrose Jun 2015 #63
Nothing a simple DNA test won't settle. Shadowflash Jun 2015 #4
What would she do if ann--- Jun 2015 #14
Exactly. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #30
Does this mean wheniwasincongress Jun 2015 #49
Using her logic, most of us don't have any proof our parents are our parents either. LisaL Jun 2015 #6
Damn, I was always afraid I was adopted! I'll have to rethink this... Elmer S. E. Dump Jun 2015 #31
Yeah, me too! In fact, I think I got dropped off on the wrong planet when I Nay Jun 2015 #54
I like to think I was dropped off from another planet Elmer S. E. Dump Jun 2015 #66
Jeez, they need to hurry. I'm dyin' here. nt Nay Jun 2015 #67
This lady needs help leftynyc Jun 2015 #7
She seems to be the best part of her family... lame54 Jun 2015 #11
Then the whole lot of them leftynyc Jun 2015 #17
I would never defend her either. murielm99 Jun 2015 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author GGJohn Jun 2015 #69
Sigh... some people should never be allowed to procreate and, if they do, should not be allowed to 1monster Jun 2015 #19
thanks, that's illuminating wordpix Jun 2015 #28
+1000 rosesaylavee Jun 2015 #64
I did think it was odd when her mother outed her nt LiberalElite Jun 2015 #70
She has just lost it. Gone around the bend. douggg Jun 2015 #8
Crazy person says crazy things. nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #9
I've been reading about the one drop rule recently, reminds me of something else in history jakeXT Jun 2015 #10
IOW....it's made up! AlbertCat Jun 2015 #18
I've seen a study where I believe they use 2% or 1% jakeXT Jun 2015 #25
She could get an ancestry DNA test Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2015 #20
Judging her from this article, I believe she's not aware of it jakeXT Jun 2015 #34
Delusional. She's tipped over. nt WheelWalker Jun 2015 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Jun 2015 #13
a new fluidity in race AlbertCat Jun 2015 #15
I haven't seen a DNA test either nt Veldrick Jun 2015 #16
I think I'll post this here.... the punch line came to mind after reading this.... AlbertCat Jun 2015 #21
I think she may be correct KamaAina Jun 2015 #23
"Savannah Guthrie pointed out there's a birth certificate that lists the Dolezals as her parents" KamaAina Jun 2015 #24
This woman is insane Man from Pickens Jun 2015 #29
This keeps getting more and more bizarro. Frankly, can't we just move on and let Rachel, Cleita Jun 2015 #32
I agree the birth certificate by itself proves nothing marshall Jun 2015 #35
there would be no point nor use in a cindyperry Jun 2015 #36
I identify as rich Major Nikon Jun 2015 #37
! csziggy Jun 2015 #62
Keep digging, Rachel. n/t cloudbase Jun 2015 #38
I hope she gets the help she needs. nt City Lights Jun 2015 #39
problem is people keep handing her shovels--folie a cent MisterP Jun 2015 #41
Savannah Guthrie needs to investigate further ... JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #42
She was born under a cabbage leaf. 840high Jun 2015 #43
"Her ability to think she has a choice" shows that she's SICK rocktivity Jun 2015 #44
the more this story heaven05 Jun 2015 #45
All I Know About Eachel Dolezal Is Vogon_Glory Jun 2015 #47
Oh my, now she sounds like a "birther" Historic NY Jun 2015 #48
This woman is either completely disingenuous or has some mental issues. Beacool Jun 2015 #50
Or both! Elmer S. E. Dump Jun 2015 #68
I am so done with this story alboe Jun 2015 #53
You and me both medeak Jun 2015 #58
WILL THE MEDIA STOP COVERING THIS STORY? medeak Jun 2015 #57
Nope. They'll milk this for all they can. It's what they do. Throd Jun 2015 #60
If the media get real lucky sulphurdunn Jun 2015 #59
The "poor woman" seems to be happily giving interviews. LisaL Jun 2015 #61
That's all the more reason to stop giving her more rope. sulphurdunn Jun 2015 #65
THIS WOMAN IS DRIVING ME UP THE WALL, Steve. bravenak Jun 2015 #71
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rachel Dolezal: 'No biolo...»Reply #10