Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

swilton

(5,069 posts)
8. I prefer a simpler approach to having more debates each debate focusing on specific
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 07:19 PM
Jun 2015

critical issues: environment, economics, etc.

Including third party candidates

Having moderators from independent media outlets

To me the above approach is making the system more complex w/o offering any improvement in having the moderators ask substantive questions....For example, what does it mean by 'expanding and enriching the debate content'? The debates are to be faulted not because they are not expansive but because they are too expansive as they stand.

What does it mean by embracing social media platforms - we tried that with Diane Rehm's infamous list of legislators who had dual citizenship....

I don't see that the above is any form of improvement.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bipartisan Group Urges Ov...»Reply #8