Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sanity Claws

(22,416 posts)
17. I disagree
Thu Jun 18, 2015, 10:51 AM
Jun 2015

I disagree that I jumped to conclusions or that the cost bill is reasonable.
There is no way anyone can convince me that 5 expert witnesses are required to defend against a single plaintiff in an employment discrimination suit.
That is based on about 17 years of experience practicing in the field.
I maintain that this kind of spending is to keep other plaintiffs from filing suit. How many plaintiff law firms can advance that kind of money? How many would want to risk that kind of money? They can't.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ellen Pao must pay Kleine...»Reply #17