Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: NASA: We Are Going to Europa [View all]secondvariety
(1,245 posts)39. And if you were substantially closer
to the Sun you'd be dead. And if you handle plutonium-238 you'll probably die. If Cassini had collided with Earth and scattered it's plutonium, NASA figured it would have caused up to 5000 additional cancer deaths.
I understand perfectly the advantages with a nuclear propulsion system-I just don't think it's a good idea for a landing or even a close fly by on a body that has the best possible chance at life outside of Earth.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Haven't read it. On Europa, we won't be spitting ions to get around. What are the amp hours?
Blue State Bandit
Jun 2015
#8
You need a minimum of 3HP just to get around, and if we hit a strong current...
Blue State Bandit
Jun 2015
#17
The sun is nuclear, you want to stop that too? without "nuclear powered stuff" we'd have no Cassini
Baclava
Jun 2015
#23
I was going to say that just about everything in space with any energy is nuclear.
The Stranger
Jun 2015
#32
Radiation is why humans aren't now in deep space, we are weak and needy, robots will rule the stars!
Baclava
Jun 2015
#35
if life is found the creationists will say the devil put it there to confuse us.
Javaman
Jun 2015
#24