Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: MSNBC: Nebraska's Ben Nelson will not seek reelection. [View all]OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)75. He voted against the Dem agenda a little over half the time
..which is bad, I concede. However, he did vote with us on key issues (such as health care reform) and will be missed when whatever Mike Johanns clone becomes the new junior senator from Nebraska.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That 'same sex stuff' is a fake out. He Voted YES on a Constitutional ban on marriage
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2011
#23
Forgot to add "Deciding vote on Bush Tax Cuts" and "Voted against raising debt ceiling".
bullwinkle428
Dec 2011
#37
He was with us on Medicare and Soc Sec and those votes are coming and he'll be gone!
SugarShack
Dec 2011
#82
If the Party does not know who to run, that is a huge failure on their part.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2011
#25
You already have said you lived your whole life in a blue state. You clearly dont understand what
stevenleser
Dec 2011
#42
Let's see how all the folks who claim it's easy to replace Blue Dogs with "real" Dems now.
dmallind
Dec 2011
#17
but why waste resources that can go to winnable races, such as Warren's, Berkley's, Heitkamp's etc.
liskddksil
Dec 2011
#20
Because of the 79%. Who gets to lead the Senate and committees depends on numbers too. nt
dmallind
Dec 2011
#29
which is why we need use our limited resources to help the candidates that can win, so we can hold
liskddksil
Dec 2011
#34
And his far right GOP replacement? How do you think they will vote on those committees? nt
stevenleser
Dec 2011
#43
You miss the point. The Senate numbers determine who leads and forms committees
dmallind
Dec 2011
#49
Sometimes things need to get worse before they can get better. Nelson is a sell-out to the 1% if
harun
Dec 2011
#48
How long until he passes through the revolving door and reappears as a healthco lobbyist?
Bozita
Dec 2011
#2
Dunno about loopholes, but I'm pretty sure the waiting period for lobbyist is 5 years now.
TheWraith
Dec 2011
#38
Why don't you wait and see who's running on our side before you CHICKEN OUT!!!
bigdarryl
Dec 2011
#11
And that fact, if it is a fact, is a failure on the part of the Party leadership, national
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2011
#26
Explain how you get a "deep bench" when you cannot even elect a Democratic janitor.
joeglow3
Dec 2011
#51
Yes. They have a different concept of what it means to be a Democrat. Best evidence of this
stevenleser
Dec 2011
#40
Which now makes 7 Democrats and 2 Republicans retiring from The Sentate - LIST on link below
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#44
"I know all there is to know about the holograms"...sung to the Crying Game
Safetykitten
Dec 2011
#59
A republican will replace his seat and outside the letter we won't be able to tell the difference
LynneSin
Dec 2011
#64
I knew Bruning was the guy when they ran a massive ad camaign for his unopposed run for AG
OmahaBlueDog
Dec 2011
#77