Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hack89

(39,181 posts)
13. A three year, war emergency act. OK
Thu May 3, 2012, 05:05 PM
May 2012

1. the first two have nothing to do with the government running commercial banks. It involves the establishment of the national banking system.

2. Amtrak came about because of the imminent collapse of passenger train service. The government did not seize a commercially viable company. Much of its acquisitions came through the bankruptcy of privately owned companies.

3. CONRAIL also involved the government buying the assets of bankrupt private companies. It was turned over to private investors 11 years later. Like Amtrak, it only came about due to the imminent collapse freight train service.

4. Resolution Trust Corporation did not run savings and loans. It was a mechanism to sell the assets of failed and insolvent savings and loans.

5. The TSA did not nationalize any private security companies.

Of the rest, I will give you the TVA even though it is very localized and never replicated elsewhere.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good for Bolivia! MNBrewer May 2012 #1
The "snatching" is with compensation. The headline is bullshit. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #4
What's a "guarantee" from a thief worth? DetlefK May 2012 #7
"thief"? It is a legal act. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #8
Legal according to Boliva 4th law of robotics May 2012 #16
This was posted yesterday, though not with the cool pro-international bourgeoisie spin. Comrade Grumpy May 2012 #2
People of America demand compensation for 500 years of exploitation. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #3
Is paying for snatch legal in Spain? jberryhill May 2012 #5
Bolivia to conquistador imperialists: Drop Dead! provis99 May 2012 #6
Oh this is such horse hockey fasttense May 2012 #9
So you can point out in America where any government at any level hack89 May 2012 #10
United States Railroad Administration Warren Stupidity May 2012 #12
A three year, war emergency act. OK hack89 May 2012 #13
keep spinning. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #14
The fundamental difference hack89 May 2012 #15
You asked a specific question and you got your answer. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #17
If you can't see how your examples have anything to do with what happened in Bolivia hack89 May 2012 #18
LOL hack89 treads water... Ash_F May 2012 #19
Who are the bad guys? hack89 May 2012 #21
Sucking away a countries financial resources in one-sided deals... Ash_F May 2012 #23
Can you show how much money Bolivia lost on the deal? hack89 May 2012 #25
There goes Bolivia's foreign investments. nt hack89 May 2012 #11
Oh no! How will they survive without daddy Europe? Ash_F May 2012 #20
Look to Venezula's oil industry for your answer. hack89 May 2012 #22
Venezula will figure it out. Ash_F May 2012 #24
Doubtful hack89 May 2012 #26
Would you include... rayofreason May 2012 #29
Spain is arguing the fair price value may3rd May 2012 #27
You don't 'really' own anything when you deal internationally jeanmarc May 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Spain demands payment for...»Reply #13