Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

7962

(11,841 posts)

19. Matter of fact, yeah, directly from Fabius. 2nd link from a couple weeks ago

Reply to karynnj (Reply #17)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:37 PM

Jun 2015

Its not a matter of trusting them, its a matter of NOT trusting Iran,who has never shown any evidence of being trustworthy in the past. The fact is, the Mullahs are who really run the country. Just because they're not involved in negotiations means absolutely nothing. THEY run the country. The people of Iran have very little say in the matter either.
Fabius says things are STILL not clear. And the 30th is 4 days away.
http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/06/21/iran-nuclear-fabius-idINKBN0P10S620150621
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/27/laurent-fabius-france-no-nuclear-deal-iran-refuses-inspections-military-sites

If total inspections are not allowed, any agreement is worthless. And whats with the 10 yr term anyway? So its OK for them to have a bomb in 10 yrs?

Its all Bush's fault in the end. If not for the Iraq invasion, Saddam wouldve probably already attacked iran and destroyed their facilites!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Former Obama aides say U.S. needs tougher Iran nuclear deal [View all] bananas Jun 2015 OP

Hate to say "told you so". Well, not really. 7962 Jun 2015 #1

that is not what happened in the interim agreement karynnj Jun 2015 #6

I'm only eager for there not to be a capitulation just to get an agreement. 7962 Jun 2015 #7

Note that it is not just the US but the P5 karynnj Jun 2015 #8

France, rarely a hawk in anything, doesn't buy what Iran is peddling. 7962 Jun 2015 #15

You heard this directly from Fabius? karynnj Jun 2015 #17

Matter of fact, yeah, directly from Fabius. 2nd link from a couple weeks ago 7962 Jun 2015 #19

I wonder what Netanyahu is paying these people n/t cosmicone Jun 2015 #2

My thoughts exactly. Petraeus, Cartwright, Einhorn, Ross - the warrior class. Don't trust 'em. Zen Democrat Jun 2015 #3

I wonder how the mullahs leftynyc Jun 2015 #9

Where did I say that mullahs have my trust or inspections shouldn't be allowed? cosmicone Jun 2015 #10

You're trying (but failing) to lay leftynyc Jun 2015 #12

They are not the negotiating team cosmicone Jun 2015 #13

LOL leftynyc Jun 2015 #14

Ha! The palestinians have never said they'd give up terror if the '67 borders came back 7962 Jun 2015 #16

How does "a nuclear iran threaten a perpetual land grab by israel"? 6chars Jun 2015 #26

It is mostly psychological cosmicone Jun 2015 #29

not sure i like the sound of that 6chars Jun 2015 #30

Please list ONE person - here or in the negotiations on the P5 + 1 side who agrees with a plan karynnj Jun 2015 #18

Perhaps you're confusing me leftynyc Jun 2015 #20

No - I am addressing what you wrote -- I DO think many putting out lies on karynnj Jun 2015 #22

So you think they don't just leftynyc Jun 2015 #23

I never said they were paid by Bibi. They have their karynnj Jun 2015 #24

The person I was leftynyc Jun 2015 #25

Likud and Mullahs are otherwise identical cosmicone Jun 2015 #28

that might be hyperbole 6chars Jun 2015 #31

might you be giving him a little too much credit? 6chars Jun 2015 #27

LOL: Dennis Ross - what a joke. n/t cpwm17 Jun 2015 #4

look at the organizations they represent karynnj Jun 2015 #5

Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. War pigs are stubborn. nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #11

Is Petraeus writing from jail? Because he should be. TwilightGardener Jun 2015 #21