Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: SCOTUS Strikes Down Three Strikes Law and Increased Sentencing Law as Violation of Due Process [View all]Hekate
(100,133 posts)86. What a week this is. I am by now just stunned.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
SCOTUS Strikes Down Three Strikes Law and Increased Sentencing Law as Violation of Due Process [View all]
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
OP
The hate just drips out of his pours. Imagine we have something so ugly on our SC. you cannot
Cha
Jun 2015
#97
Ironic that the three strikes seem to be these decisions to strike down our feelings about the TPA!
cascadiance
Jun 2015
#60
You're reading my mind, rocktivity. The PTB have nothing to lose now that they
valerief
Jun 2015
#64
Wanted to post this on Facebook, but in a format people will read. Google doesn't come up with a
DebJ
Jun 2015
#5
DU may be the first in the entire media world to post it.....I had a direct source.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#18
The Fifth Amendment just got a huge boost...this has very wide implications....think of the detained
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#25
Will this mean those folks who are currently incarcerated under 3 strikes,
riderinthestorm
Jun 2015
#22
My take is if any of previous of three strikes was a "violent felony" as defined, with a firearm, engaging the residual clause, and the accused was
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#32
Interesting. I've read a few cases where folks are incarcerated for drug offenses
riderinthestorm
Jun 2015
#38
I may be reading this too broadly, but the fact that the entire enhanced sentence provision is
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#47
True--but this is the Court that gifted us with Citizens United so it's not likely, is it? nt
truebluegreen
Jun 2015
#29
I started reading his dissent and that's not how it comes off at the beginning.
Renew Deal
Jun 2015
#39
Good. I am reeling form all these June decisions. Getting scared - waiting for the other shoe to
jwirr
Jun 2015
#31
If one of the previous convictions involved a mere firearm possession then a resentencing should be automatic, that
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#49
so no more Three Strikes Law allowed? That law has put a lot of people in prisons for life.
Sunlei
Jun 2015
#58
The core decision is more narrow than that, confined to strike down the punitive "residual clause" on the
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#63
Not sure at all what you meant, but a narrow focus to strike down, '3-strike' I understand.
Sunlei
Jun 2015
#66
California's citizens voted it in as a Proposition on the ballot, iirc. Don't know about the rest...
Hekate
Jun 2015
#87
This is great! Do the 3-Strikers get released from their life sentences now?
Dont call me Shirley
Jun 2015
#70
Can the State's 3 strikes convictions be challenged in court by the convicted?
Dont call me Shirley
Jun 2015
#100
One of the most important rulings ever. A lot of sentences should be reduced over this...
marble falls
Jun 2015
#71
Criminal sentence laws that are ruled unconstitutional are retrospective as well, and retroactive to any current sentences being served.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#75
Good news. Justice will be picking the private prisons industry's pockets.
marble falls
Jun 2015
#76